Skip to content
Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliates at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliates

Umass memorial health care is committed to improving the health of the people of central new england through excellence in clinical care, service, teaching, and research.

$9.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$46MEducation$21MHuman Services$133kFood & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$20kHousing & Shelter$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $250k+3 grants · $8.8M
$1,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL$6,850,000
FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTER INC$1,000,000
EDWARD M KENNEDY COMMUNITY HEALTH CTR INC$1,000,000
PHYSICIAN HEALTH SERVICES INC$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YWCA Centeral Massachusetts Inc: $46k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 97% of Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliates’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 76%.

Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliateslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75M · 8 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$75M
$259k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+48%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.1M · revenue +116%
  • EM
    EDWARD M KENNEDY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.0M · revenue +78%
  • PH
    PHYSICIAN HEALTH SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $153k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • LC
    LUK CRISIS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $87k · revenue +48%
  • YWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $46k · revenue +1%
  • GI
    GAAMHA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $36k · revenue +223%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts E-Health Collaborative
—
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc

Glhfc's mission is to improve and maintain the health of individuals and families in the merrimack valley by providing a network of high quality, comprehensive health care services and by training health care professionals who can respond…

Health
6
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.

Health
7
Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital

We advance health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships, providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health
8
Lowell Community Health Center Inc

Lowell community health center's mission is to provide caring, quality, and culturally competent health services to the people of greater lowell, regardless of their financial status; to reduce health disparities and enhance the health of…

Health
9
Central Massachusetts Area Health Education Center

The mission of the organization is to enhance access to quality health care, promote workforce development, and eliminate health inequities.

Human Services
10
Rochester Regional Health

The organization is organized and operated for the benefit of all of the affiliates within rochester regional health system. the organization supports and assists the affiliates by reviewing and monitoring their missions, objectives,…

Health
11
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
12
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health Center of Worcesterinc; the most unlike its peers is North Central Massachusetts Chamber Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $56,828,041 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC: $9,082,029 · OtherFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC+7 more: $205,940 · OtherEDWARD M KENNEDY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $9,000,002 · HealthEDWARD M KENN…+5 more: $329,600 · HealthYWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $45,600 · Human ServicesREGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL MASS INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$66,116,010Health$9,329,602Human Services$45,600Environment$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF WORCESTERINC: $9,082,029 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetEDWARD M KENNEDY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $9,000,002 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetPHYSICIAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $152,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $130,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUK CRISIS CENTER INC: $86,974 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC: $45,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGAAMHA INC: $35,818 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC: $22,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $18,398 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL MASS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Worcester Com…Reliant Foundation IncThe Health Foundation…UMass Memorial Health…Community Foundation …Fallon Community Heal…United Way of Central…Health Resources in A…Henry Heywood Memoria…Rollstone Charitable …Massachusetts Service…The Fred Harris Danie…
Greater Worcester Community Foundation IncMA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · Reliant Foundation Inc · The Health Foundation of Central Massach · UMass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent) · Community Foundation of North Central Ma · Fallon Community Health Plan Inc · United Way of Central Massachusetts Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Henry Heywood Memorial Hospital · Rollstone Charitable Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Service Alliance Inc · The Fred Harris Daniels Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliates funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliates. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • Luk Crisis Center Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Gaamha Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Family Health Center of Worcesterinc: 39% of income from government
  • Community Health Connections Inc: 32% of income from government
  • The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Edward M Kennedy Community Health Center Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Regional Environmental Council Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Umass Memorial Health Care Inc & Affiliates’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home