Skip to content
Uma Education Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Uma Education Inc

Uma education, inc.

$974k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$473kEducation$305kFood & Nutrition$148kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kYouth Development$42kPhilanthropy$38kCivil Rights$20kCommunity Improvement$19k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $275,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $974,426 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $699,426 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $127k
$36,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$743M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$76,500
CLINICAL AND PATIENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION$50,000
UNITED WAY SUN COAST INC$38,000
FEEDING TAMPA BAY$36,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$25,500
FAPSC FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$24,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $24k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $13k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Uma Education Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 48%.

Uma Education Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$771k · 8 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$771k
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+23%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $217k · revenue +43%
  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $148k · revenue +79%
  • CA
    CLINICAL AND PATIENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • SM
    SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $220k · revenue +23%
  • TY
    The Youth Mental Health Project
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue -93%
  • NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
2
American College of Physicians Inc

The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…

Health
3
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
4
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
5
National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc

The national network of public health institutes, inc. (nnphi) is a national public health organization chartered on june 21, 2001. its mission is to support national public health system initiatives and strengthen public health institutes…

Health
6
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
7
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
8
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
9
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
12
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Youth Mental Health Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Heart Association Inc: $217,225 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $95,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCLINICAL AND PATIENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION: $85,000 · HealthCLINICAL AND PATIENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIATIO…SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART): $220,000 · EducationSCHOOLS MENTORING AND …FAPSC FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · OtherFAPSC FOUNDATION INCThe Youth Mental Health Project: $75,000 · OtherThe Youth Mental Hea…Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc: $42,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sis…FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $148,283 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA…UNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC: $51,500 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $46,700 · Human ServicesNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsCORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INC: $5,500 · Community Improvement
Health$397,725Education$220,000Other$202,000Food & Nutrition$148,283Philanthropy$51,500Human Services$46,700Civil Rights$20,000Community Improvement$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART): $220,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $217,225 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $148,283 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $95,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLINICAL AND PATIENT EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION: $85,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetThe Youth Mental Health Project: $75,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC: $51,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $46,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc: $42,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitabl…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uma Education Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uma Education Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • United Way Suncoast Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Uma Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home