Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ulmschneider Educational Foundation Judy Ellis Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$235kHealth$34kHuman Services$13kFood & Nutrition$10kHousing & Shelter$9kEmployment$8kYouth Development$5kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$26,120
Individual grant recipient$18,907
Individual grant recipient$5,953
Individual grant recipient$3,000
501 COMMONS$2,637
TREEHOUSE FOR KIDS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,816
JACKSON STREET YOUTH SERVICES$1,418
CANCER LINELINE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$400
SPLC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RYAN'S HOUSE: $2k → 7%RYAN'S HOUSE: $2k → 7%RYAN'S HOUSE: $1k → 7%RYAN'S HOUSE: $500 → 7%ACRS: $1k → 9%ACRS: $500 → 9%ACRS: $125 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 18 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
15

Total granted

$279k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+23%

Still filing today

44%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesEmploymentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TREEHOUSE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +78%
  • NE
    NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +133%
  • RH
    RYAN'S HOUSE
    4× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
2
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
3
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
4
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
5
Washington Vocational Services

To provide job development, job seeking skills and job placement for persons with disabilities. we are dedicated to providing outstanding quality services that result in successful community involvement and employment for persons with…

Employment
6
Seattle Jobs Initiative

Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.

Employment
7
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
8
Cares of Washington

Support people with disabilities and low incomes to realize their purpose, potential and strength.

Employment
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Washington Education Association

The mission of the washington education association is to advance the professional interests of its members in order to make public education the best it can be for students, staff, and communities.

—
11
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
12
The University of Puget Sound

University of puget sound, as a community of learning, maintains a strong commitment to teaching excellence, scholarly engagement, and fruitful student-faculty interaction. the mission of the university is to develop in its students'…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lemnis; the most unlike its peers is Ryan's House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $117,054 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,030 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $19,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $19,373 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $14,968 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,121 · Other+22 more: $44,766 · Other+22 moreLEMNIS: $8,060 · EducationNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS: $8,000 · EducationDOANE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationTREEHOUSE: $9,646 · Youth DevelopmentSUMMER SEARCH: $7,665 · EmploymentRYAN'S HOUSE: $5,559 · Human ServicesASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $1,625 · Human ServicesCANCER LIFELINE: $2,566 · HealthFRIENDS OF FRIENDS: $100 · Health501 Commons: $2,637 · Community Improvement
Other$273,112Education$18,060Youth Development$9,646Employment$7,665Human Services$7,184Health$2,666Community Improvement$2,637

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTREEHOUSE: $9,646 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEMNIS: $8,060 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $7,665 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRYAN'S HOUSE: $5,559 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSeattle Education Association: $5,138 over 2y, 0.1% of budget501 Commons: $2,637 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE: $2,566 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOANE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $1,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $1,418 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHIDBEY INSTITUTE: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FRIENDS: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LEMNIS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
  • Who funds RYAN'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Seattle Education Association ↗
  • Who funds 501 Commons ↗
  • Who funds CANCER LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds DOANE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WHIDBEY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FRIENDS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ulmschneider Educational Foundation Judy Ellis Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ulmschneider Educational Foundation Judy Ellis Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 59%
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ulmschneider Educational Foundation Judy Ellis Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph