Skip to content

· Private foundation

UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$147kHealth$124kPhilanthropy$11kCivil Rights$11kArts & Culture$9kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
UFCW Local 951 Foundation$6,000
UFCW Local 75 - Shoot for a Cure$5,000
UFCW Local 880 Scholarship Fund$5,000
UFCW Local 75 Charity Foundation$5,000
UFCW 876 Charitable Foundation$2,000
UFCW Charity Foundation Fundraiser$1,867
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Down Syndrome Indiana$1,500
UFCW Local 227 Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Down Syndrome Indiana: $2k → 16%Down Syndrome Indiana: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
KY
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$349k · 16 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$349k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
-13%

Still filing today

38%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SHOOT FOR A CURE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $16k · revenue +34%
  • U9
    UFCW 951 MARISA DIDUR MEMBERS HELPING MEMBERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue +30%
  • AS
    AUTISM SOCIETY OF INDIANA
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • U9
    UFCW 951 Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • UL
    UFCW Local 1059
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana State Afl-Cio

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
2
Ufcw Inland Empire Charity Foundation

To grant scholarships and make charitable contributions.

Education
3
Ufcw Local 1546 Charity Fund

To raise funds and contribute the proceeds of the said funds to various reputable charities.

Health
4
Electical Workers Indianapolis Motorcycle Group Inc
Human Services
5
Usw 1-346 Charity Fund Inc
Membership Benefit
6
Indiana Women in Need Foundation Inc

I.w.i.n. foundation supports women statewide currently receiving treatment for breast cancer by securing and paying for individual services that relieve emotional, physical, and financial burdens.

Human Services
7
Ufcw Region 8 States Council

Create united action in the interests of the locals and membership, to assist in the organization of the unorganized, to secure and promote legislation enacted in various cities and states of the region, to cooperate with all city, county,…

—
8
Fallen Brothers and Sisters Inc

To engage in charitable activities and lessen the burden of government by providing assistance and relief to families of members of Local Unions affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America State of Indiana District…

Human Services
9
Adams County Cancer Coalition Inc

To coordinate and provide aid and relief to those individuals and families, in adams county indiana, who have been diagnosed with cancer and also give funds to research agencies so they can find a better treatment and cancer cure.

Human Services
10
Ufcw Unions & Employers Health & Welfare Plan of Central Ohio

To provide for a uniform health and welfare program for employees employed under certain collective bargaining agreements.

—
11
United We Care Fund

Fund will seek to support united supermarkets employees who need emergency financial assistance due to unexpected crisis, hardship, or disaster.

Philanthropy
12
Northern Ohio Fire Fighters Inc

Assist Firefighters - Labor Union

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ufcw Charity Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $102,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $63,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUFCW Local 75 - Shoot for a Cure: $18,000 · OtherUFCW Local 75 - Shoot for a CureUFCW Local 227 Foundation: $11,500 · OtherUFCW Local 75 Charity Foundation: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $50,617 · Other+21 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $84,450 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCSHOOT FOR A CURE: $15,500 · HealthSHOOT FOR A CUREAUTISM SOCIETY OF INDIANA: $10,000 · HealthAUTISM SOCIETY OF INDIANAUFCW 951 MARISA DIDUR MEMBERS HELPING MEMBERS FOUNDATION: $11,000 · PhilanthropyUFCW CHARITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropyUFCW LOCAL 371 COMMUNITY CHARITY INC: $500 · PhilanthropyEMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC: $4,000 · ReligionDOWN SYNDROME INDIANA INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$255,317Health$109,950Philanthropy$12,000Religion$4,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $84,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHOOT FOR A CURE: $15,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUFCW 951 MARISA DIDUR MEMBERS HELPING MEMBERS FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF INDIANA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME INDIANA INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUFCW CHARITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA AREA LABOR FEDERAT: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOOT FOR A CURE ↗
  • Who funds UFCW 951 MARISA DIDUR MEMBERS HELPING MEMBERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds UFCW CHARITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UFCW LOCAL 371 COMMUNITY CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA AREA LABOR FEDERAT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on UFCW Local 700’s filings →

    More from the funding graph