· Private foundation
UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| UFCW Local 951 Foundation | $5,000 |
| UFCW Local 75 - Shoot for a Cure | $5,000 |
| UFCW Local 75 Charity Foundation | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Down Syndrome Indiana | $1,000 |
| UFCW Local 227 Foundation | $1,000 |
| UFCW Local 880 Scholarship Fund | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| UFCW Charity Foundation Fundraiser | $500 |
| Northern Indiana Area Labor Federation | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC3× · 2018–2021 · $84k · revenue -18%
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2024 · $82k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2018–2020 · $63k
Funded once
- U9UFCW 951 Foundationone grant, 2023 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- ULUFCW Local 1059one grant, 2023 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
To grant scholarships and make charitable contributions.
To raise funds and contribute the proceeds of the said funds to various reputable charities.
I.w.i.n. foundation supports women statewide currently receiving treatment for breast cancer by securing and paying for individual services that relieve emotional, physical, and financial burdens.
To coordinate and provide aid and relief to those individuals and families, in adams county indiana, who have been diagnosed with cancer and also give funds to research agencies so they can find a better treatment and cancer cure.
To engage in charitable activities and lessen the burden of government by providing assistance and relief to families of members of Local Unions affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America State of Indiana District…
Create united action in the interests of the locals and membership, to assist in the organization of the unorganized, to secure and promote legislation enacted in various cities and states of the region, to cooperate with all city, county,…
Assist Firefighters - Labor Union
The ufcw charity golf classic, inc. provides donations to organizations that are organized exclusively for religious, charitable, medical care, scientific, literary, or educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ufcw Charity Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SHOOT FOR A CURE ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF INDIANA ↗
- Who funds UFCW 951 MARISA DIDUR MEMBERS HELPING MEMBERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds UFCW CHARITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UFCW LOCAL 371 COMMUNITY CHARITY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA AREA LABOR FEDERAT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to UFCW Local 700 Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.