Skip to content
Ufcw Charity Golf Classic Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ufcw Charity Golf Classic Inc

The ufcw charity golf classic, inc.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$334kHuman Services$151kPhilanthropy$69kCrime & Legal$40kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$40kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $85,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $106,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$10,000
HOUSE OF GOOD SHEPHERD$10,000
UNITED WAY OF THE VALLEY & GREATER UTICA AREA$10,000
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK$10,000
HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE$10,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
ABRAHAM HOUSE$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ABRAHAM'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%ABRAHAM'S HOUSE: $5k → 10%FOR THE GOOD INC: $10k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $5k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $5k → 16%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$663k · 19 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$663k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+200%

Still filing today

63%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $53k · revenue +33%
  • AH
    ABRAHAM HOUSE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +13%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • FM
    FEED MORE OF WESTERN NEW YORK
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • JO
    JCTOD OUTREACH INC D/B/A JOHNSON PARK CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +200%
  • LS
    LEUKEMIA SOCIETY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home Care Ii

Vns health home care is part of one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations. we help people live, age, and heal where they feel most comfortable. please refer to schedule o for additional…

Health
2
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
6
St Camillus Residential Health Care Facility

St. camillus is a residential healthcare facility dedicated to caring for life through a broad range of healthcare services. the organization operates a 284 bed skilled nursing facility which includes a 20 bed unit dedicated to traumatic…

—
7
Mercy Home for Children Inc

Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…

—
8
United Memorial Medical Center

United memorial medical center is the only acute care hospital in genesee county, with 131 licensed acute care beds that provide the necessary healthcare services to a regional population of approximately 138,000 residents and operates the…

Health
9
United Hospital Fund of New York

Working to build an effective and equitable health care system for every new yorker. (see sch. o)

Health
10
Sunnyview Hospital and Rehabilitation Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sunnyview rehabilitation hospital is a member of st. peter's health…

Health
11
Community Housing Innovations Inc

Founded in 1991, community housing innovations, inc. (chi) is a not-for-profit organization serving several new york counties. chi's mission is to provide housing and human services that support social and economic independence. chi's…

—
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATION SUNSHINE INC: $73,000 · OtherOPERATION SUNSHINE INCCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $70,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKABRAHAM HOUSE: $40,000 · OtherABRAHAM HOUSESPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INCHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $40,000 · OtherHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INCHOUSE OF GOOD SHEPHERD: $40,000 · OtherHOUSE OF GOOD SHEPHERDST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $25,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherHOSPICE CARE INC: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $30,000 · Other+4 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $52,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $30,000 · HealthSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIA…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED …Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $20,000 · HealthCitizens United for …UNITED WAY OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY INC: $68,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $15,000 · Human ServicesFOR THE GOOD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesABRAHAMS HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesJCTOD OUTREACH INC D/B/A JOHNSON PARK CENTER: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWORKING FAMILIES FRIEND: $5,000 · Employment
Other$461,500Health$127,500Philanthropy$68,500Human Services$35,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION SUNSHINE INC: $73,000 over 5y, 38% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY INC: $68,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $52,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM HOUSE: $40,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJCTOD OUTREACH INC D/B/A JOHNSON PARK CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES FRIEND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION SUNSHINE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD ↗
  • Who funds JCTOD OUTREACH INC D/B/A JOHNSON PARK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAMS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WORKING FAMILIES FRIEND ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bank of Utica Foundat…Utica National Group …The Community Foundat…Joseph and Inez E Car…Indium Corporation an…The James H Wurz Jr a…Price Chopper's Golub…Charities Aid Foundat…Baird Foundation IncGe Aerospace Foundati…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…
Bank of Utica Foundation IncNY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bank of Utica Foundation Inc · Utica National Group Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties Inc · Joseph and Inez E Carbone Foundation · Indium Corporation and Macartney Family Foundation Inc · The James H Wurz Jr and Edward T Wurz Sr Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ufcw Charity Golf Classic Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ufcw Charity Golf Classic Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ufcw Charity Golf Classic Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ufcw Charity Golf Classic Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ufcw Charity Golf Classic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home