· Private foundation
Utica National Group Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k40 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $370k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MVHS FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY | $69,576 |
| LEMOYNE COLLEGE | $50,500 |
| ONPOINT FOR COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| BOILERMAKER ROAD RACE | $40,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER & ONEIDA COUNTIES | $35,000 |
| THE HOPE HOUSE | $25,000 |
| CLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA | $15,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER AREA | $15,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,500 |
| MIDTOWN UTICA COMMUNITY CENTER | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL ASSOC FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLe Moyne College5× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +23%
- ICINTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC2× · 2019–2021 · $140k · revenue +155%
- CCCOMPASSION COALITION INC5× · 2017–2022 · $93k · revenue +244%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY (TO COVER EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS)one grant, 2020 · $160k
- RMROME MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -67%
- LCLEMOYNE COLLEGE - MCNEIL ACADEMY OF RISKone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg and the most unlike its peers is Rome Art and Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MOHAWK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOILERMAKER ROAD RACE INC ↗
- Who funds Le Moyne College ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ROME MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF UTICA INC ↗
- Who funds ON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROOT FARM INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDER VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM HOUSE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CSRA INC ↗
- Who funds UTICA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties Inc · Bank of Utica Foundation Inc · Indium Corporation and Macartney Family Foundation Inc · Joseph and Inez E Carbone Foundation · The James H Wurz Jr and Edward T Wurz Sr Foundation · Hazen B Hinman Sr Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · The Griffin Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mohawk Valley Inc · Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The Jeremiah O McCarthy Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Utica National Group Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Hope House Inc — 13% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Utica National Group Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Utica National Group Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.