Skip to content
Uaw Region 1-D Cap at a glance

· Public charity

Uaw Region 1-D Cap

Meetings, education, communication, community action and donations, non-partisan voter registration, administration of the organization, maintenance of its properties and assets, fraternal and social activities and related activities which further the common interest of the membership.

$90k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Membership Benefit$206kCivil Rights$170kRecreation & Sports$25kPublic Benefit$20kHuman Services$18kFood & Nutrition$11kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $17,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $89,965 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,165 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT$6,300
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN$6,000
UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%GLENBRIER GOLF COURSE: $5k → 12%MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL: $10k → 16%FOOD BANK OF EASTERN MICHIGAN: $6k → 16%SAGINAW AFRICAN CULTURAL FESTSANKOFA: $5k → 18%UAW MICHIGAN CAP: $206k → 21%MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL: $5k → 16%OLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT: $6k → 16%NAACP - SAGINAW BRANCH: $5k → 18%UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $150k → 21%CENTER PARK PRODUCTIONS: $5k → 16%OLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT: $6k → 16%SAGINAW FUTURE INC: $5k → 18%GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $5k → 21%NAACP LANSING BRANCH: $5k → 16%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $5k → 16%DOWNRIVER FOR VETERANS: $5k → 21%CENTER PARK PRODUCTIONS: $5k → 16%GLENBRIER GOLF COURSE: $5k → 16%OLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT: $5k → 16%GENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $5k → 16%GENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $5k → 16%THE SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$419k · 6 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$419k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM
    3× · 2018–2024 · $356k · revenue +68%
  • ON
    OLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $18k · revenue +11%
  • GC
    GENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • AP
    A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +380%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • SA
    SAGINAW AFRICAN CULTURAL FESTIVAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flint & Genesee Group

To promote the common economic interests of all the commercial enterprises in the Genesee County, Michigan community. The Organization strives to enhance the business climate in the area and advocates for public policy that supports…

Community Improvement
2
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
3
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 876

Labor union representing food and commercial workers, primarily in southeast michigan.

—
4
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
5
Michigan State Afl-Cio

Consistent with our trade union philosophy and tradition of advocating social and economic justice for all, we also see representing the unemployed, under-employed, and low income people as part of our mission. whether organized or yet to…

—
6
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
7
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
8
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Southwest Michigan Regional Chamber of Commerce

Member driven organization working to achieve economy prosperity throughout the region. it's mission is to leverage every available resource within out network for the advancement of our members and the betterment of all who live in our…

—
10
Clean Fuels Michigan

To accelerate the transition to clean transportation in michigan. we advocate for the suite of alternative fuels including biofuels, hydrogen, propane, natural gas, and electric vehicles.

Community Improvement
11
Greater Flint Health Coalition Inc

Improve the health of genesee county residents. improve the quality and cost effectiveness of the health care system in our community.

Health
12
Southeast Michigan Producers Association

To organize local, underserved, or small limited resourse farmers in the Metro detroit, MI and region to inhance their production, marketing and distribution of produce in the metropolitian detroit area.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saginaw Future Inc; the most unlike its peers is Downriver for Veterans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $356,250 · OtherUAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMOLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT INC: $17,700 · OtherMICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $35,000 · Other+5 moreCENTER PARK PRODUCTIONS: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSAGINAW AFRICAN CULTURAL FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $6,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Food & NutritionGENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY: $5,500 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWNRIVER FOR VETERANS: $5,000 · Public BenefitSAGINAW FUTURE INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$423,950Arts & Culture$15,000Food & Nutrition$11,000Health$10,000Philanthropy$5,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Public Benefit$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $356,250 over 3y, 14% of budgetOLD NEWSBOYS OF FLINT INC: $17,700 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGENESEE COUNTY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER PARK PRODUCTIONS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNRIVER FOR VETERANS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stella & Frederick Lo…Community Foundation …Charles Stewart Mott …Amazonsmile Foundation
Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable TrustOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Greater Flint · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uaw Region 1-D Cap funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uaw Region 1-D Cap. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Uaw Region 1-D Cap?

    Find your warmest path to Uaw Region 1-D Cap through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $411k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uaw Region 1-D Cap’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home