How much did UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM grant in FY2024?

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM reported 3 grants totaling $841,200 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM based?

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM is based in MI.

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM

Meetings, education, communication, community action and donations, non-partisan voter registration, administration of the organization, maintenance of its properties and assets, fraternal and social activities which further the common interests of the membership.

$841k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$750k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

gleanersprogrammingnearlymillionfood directlywelfarevouchers

2019

labor heritagehealthyindustrypreserve interpretinterpret region'sregion's automotiveautomotive labor

2020

cbtuinternationalblackworkersdonation-mdp legacyvoicefood

2021

bestrecreationalunder privilegedprivileged youthidentifyhealth

2022

detroityoutheconomic

2023

labor heritageadvocacydetroit

2024

dinner

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$250k+1 grant · $750k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$660k

Total assets

Largest grants

MICHIGAN STATE AFL-CIO$750,000
DETROIT BRANCH NAACP$50,000
MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE (MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY)$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.0M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%

+19%

Still filing today

67%

64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementRecreation & SportsCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MS
MICHIGAN STATE AFL-CIO
3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +196%
PM
PROGRESS MICHIGAN
2× · 2019–2020 · $30k · revenue +1066%
MA
METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS COALITION
4× · 2018–2022 · $26k · revenue +143%

Funded once

2C
21ST CENTURY FUND
one grant, 2018 · $450k
MO
MICHIGAN ONE FAIR WAGE CAMPAIGN
one grant, 2018 · $100k
MT
MICHIGAN TRANSITION 2019
one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Economic Justice Alliance of Michigan

To advance economic justice in michigan

Public Benefit

Michigan Voices

The organization seeks to build civic engagement capacity in progressive nonprofit groups .

Civil Rights

Michigan Environmental Justice Coalition

To end environmental injustice by empowering communities at the grassroots level.

Environment

Michigan Civic Action Fund

Promoting community welfare and providing community education in michigan by increasing voter participation through nonpartisan research and voter mobilization; increasing voter awareness of public policy issues through nonpartisan…

Civil Rights

Michigan Civic Education Fund

To initiate, cultivate, and fund strategic nonpartisan efforts in michigan to promote economic and educational opportunity; enhance the quality of life and social welfare; defend and improve government accountability, ethics, and…

Civil Rights

Citizens for a Better Michigan

To improve the quality of life for michigan residents by advocating for practicalpolicy solutions, disseminating relevant information on government policies andraising awareness of timely issues

Civil Rights

Michigan League for Public Policy

The michigan league for public policy (the "league") is a non-partisan, non-profit organization that promotes economic opportunity, independence, and security for economically vulnerable individuals, families, and children in michigan…

Human Services

Clean Fuels Michigan

To accelerate the transition to clean transportation in michigan. we advocate for the suite of alternative fuels including biofuels, hydrogen, propane, natural gas, and electric vehicles.

Community Improvement

Michigan Association for Computer Users

Macul is an organization that focuses on embedding technology into education through multiple platforms and multiple audiences. macul organizes pd events, as well as coordinates grant programs and other educational resources to support…

Education

Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education

Michigan Infrastructure & Transportation

To represent the collective concerns of road & underground construction workers and contractors.

Community Improvement

Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heat and Warmth Fund and the most unlike its peers is Gleaners Community Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/42

the rest of the field

14%

1,979/13,980

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/31

Grantees still filing

19/31

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,687,380Civil Rights$110,000Recreation & Sports$107,500Community Improvement$48,000Public Benefit$40,000Arts & Culture$35,000Education$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for SoutheastMI29.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast · Dte Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Skillman Foundation · Ascension Southeast Michigan Community Health · Ford Motor Company Fund · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Uaw Region 1-A Cap · Int Union United Auto National · Henry Ford Health System

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DETROIT YOUTH SPORTS COMMISSION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 812542771 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DETROIT YOUTH SPORTS COMMISSION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 56% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Uaw Michigan Community Action Program?

Find your warmest path to Uaw Michigan Community Action Program through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Uaw Michigan Community Action Program?

More from the funding graph

UAW MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Uaw Michigan Community Action Program?

More from the funding graph