Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ua for Helene Fuld Health Trust 10-205620

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$30MHealth$20MArts & Culture$100k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k14 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+11 grants · $12M
$200,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$121M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University Of Chattanooga Foundation$2,000,000
UNC SCHOOL OF NURSING$1,900,000
MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE$1,500,000
University Of South Florida Foundation$750,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$700,000
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$700,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$700,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$625,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$600,000
Colby-Sawyer College$550,000
SIMMONS UNIVERSITY$235,299
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING$200,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$175,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF NURS$170,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $600k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $335k → 13%COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA: $343k → 15%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $300k → 10%University of Pittsburgh: $365k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $415k → 12%TTEE OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $400k → 22%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $275k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $330k → 14%HARRIET ROTHKOPF HEILBRUNN SCHOOL OF N: $275k → 20%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $700k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE: $2.5M → 13%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $300k → 13%University of Wisconsin-Madison: $365k → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSIN: $1.3M → 17%University Of Chattanooga Foundation: $2.0M → 12%UNC SCHOOL OF NURSING: $1.9M → 9%UNC-CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF: $1.8M → 13%BYRDINE F LEWIS COLLEGE OF NURSING: $250k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $275k → 14%OHIO ST UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $300k → 16%FELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $400k → 7%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $700k → 8%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $450k → 6%Colby-Sawyer College: $550k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND: $300k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $315k → 13%THE COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA: $300k → 15%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $300k → 10%University of Pittsburgh: $335k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $335k → 12%MERCY UNIVERSITY: $425k → 9%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $365k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE: $1.5M → 13%University Of South Florida Foundation: $750k → 13%University of Wisconsin-Madison: $335k → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $625k → 17%UNC SCHOOL OF NURSING: $1.9M → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $1.2M → 13%NELL HODGSON WOODRULL SCHOOL: $275k → 14%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $950k → 15%FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY: $300k → 7%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $335k → 17%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $425k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE: $1.5M → 13%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $625k → 17%MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS: $1.5M → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 33 repeat orgs$21M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
36

Total granted

$28M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+12%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    4× · 2020–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +24%
  • NY
    New York University
    2× · 2020–2021 · $700k · revenue +45%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $700k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNC-CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF
    one grant, 2022 · $1.8M
  • MU
    MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSIN
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2021 · $1.2M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE: $5,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGEUNC SCHOOL OF NURSING: $3,800,000 · OtherUNC SCHOOL OF NURSINGUNC-CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF: $1,800,000 · OtherUNC-CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OFMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $1,500,000 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSIN: $1,250,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $1,200,000 · OtherOHIO ST UNIVERSITY: $1,100,000 · Other+40 more: $16,370,000 · Other+40 moreUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION IN…Marquette University: $1,925,000 · EducationMarquette UniversityUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $750,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $700,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $700,000 · EducationNew York University: $700,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $700,000 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $680,041 · EducationFairfield University: $650,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $642,786 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $600,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $600,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $600,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $600,000 · Education+18 more: $5,285,000 · Education+18 more
Other$32,520,000Education$17,132,827

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMarquette University: $1,925,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $750,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $700,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $700,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $700,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $700,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $680,041 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFairfield University: $650,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $642,786 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $600,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColby-Sawyer College: $550,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $530,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY UNIVERSITY: $425,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLABOURE COLLEGE OF HEALTHCARE INC: $400,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $400,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $400,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $325,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of New England: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHartwick College: $175,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY: $160,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION INC: $160,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds MERCY UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ua for Helene Fuld Health Trust 10-205620 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ua for Helene Fuld Health Trust 10-205620. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Regis College: 1% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Simmons University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ua for Helene Fuld Health Trust 10-205620’s filings →

More from the funding graph