· Private foundation
Ua for Helene Fuld Health Trust 10-205620
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k14 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+11 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University Of Chattanooga Foundation | $2,000,000 |
| UNC SCHOOL OF NURSING | $1,900,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA COLLEGE | $1,500,000 |
| MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS | $1,500,000 |
| University Of South Florida Foundation | $750,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $700,000 |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $700,000 |
| FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY | $700,000 |
| MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY | $625,000 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | $600,000 |
| Colby-Sawyer College | $550,000 |
| SIMMONS UNIVERSITY | $235,299 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING | $200,000 |
| CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY | $175,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF NURS | $170,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.0M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MUMarquette University4× · 2020–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +24%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH2× · 2020–2021 · $700k · revenue +26%- NYNew York University2× · 2020–2021 · $700k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- UHUNC-CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OFone grant, 2022 · $1.8M
- MUMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSINone grant, 2023 · $1.3M
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAone grant, 2021 · $1.2M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Education, research, medical services and other public services.
Education and Research
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 68 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Marquette University ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Fairfield University ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ua for Helene Fuld Health Trust 10-205620 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Regis College — 1% of income from government
- Fairleigh Dickinson University — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
- Simmons University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.