Skip to content

· Private foundation

Two Mauds Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$264k
Granted FY2024still arriving
47
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$1.6MHousing & Shelter$38kHealth$23kHuman Services$13kEnvironment$12kEducation$10kReligion$3kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k41 grants · $196k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $68k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE$15,000
VIRGINIA FEDERATION OF HUMANE SOCIETIES$12,000
SPAY TENNESSEE$11,000
PEOPLE FOR ANIMALS$10,000
GRAINGER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
FRIENDS OF MADISON COUNTY ANIMALS$10,000
FERAL CAT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM$8,000
FRIENDS OF RUSSELL COUNTY VA ANIMAL$8,000
HELPING HOUNDS FIND HOMES$8,000
HARLAN COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE SHELTER$8,000
STEEL VALLEY WOOFSTOCK INC$8,000
VETERINARIANS TO THE RESCUE$8,000
TRAPPER GIRLS COMMUNITY CAT COALITION$8,000
THE CAT'S VOICE WV INC$6,500
NORTH GEORGIA ANIMAL ALLIANCE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%FOR THE CATS SAKE: $5k → 10%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%FOR THE CATS SAKE: $4k → 10%NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%FOR THE CATS SAKE: $4k → 10%FOR THE CATS SAKE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
UT
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 92 repeat orgs$550k to everyone else

92 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
90

Total granted

$1.2M
$479k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+73%

Still filing today

57%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    VIRGINIA FEDERATION OF HUMANE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +414%
  • WA
    WOODSTOCK ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +39%
  • SC
    SPAY CAMPBELL COUNTY TENNESSEE PETS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • SN
    Spay Neuter Incentive Program of WVgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +131%
  • BW
    Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +583%
  • CD
    COLUMBUS DOG CONNECTION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cats At the Studios Inc

Cat rescue spay/ nueter

Animals
2
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
3
Feline Urban Rescue and Rehab Inc

To reduce the number of cats taken to shelters by promoting the importance of spaying/neutering and cat adoptions.

Animals
4
Claws and Paws for a Cause

For our community we provide high quality low cost spay and neuter services as well as low cost vaccinations. we do have programs that allows us to help the families that have pets but are in financial strain and not able to have their…

Religion
5
Peggys Paws

Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area

Animals
6
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
7
Pleasants County Humane Society Inc

Shelter & loving care for strays

Recreation & Sports
8
Haywood Pet Care Inc

Providing low-cost spay/neuter services and animal wellness programs

Animals
9
Humane Society of Hardy County Inc

The Humane Society Hardy County strives reduce feral animal populations while enhancing the health of our communities and providing for those animals that may be adopted, a safe, nurturing, and healthy environment.

Animals
10
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
11
Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc

Survivors Paws Animal Rescue Inc rescues dogs and cats from southern state kill shelters and off the streets to save them being euthanized. We also help contract by the pet population by spaying and neutering and educating the public on…

Animals
12
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Smyth County Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Memorial University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/111
Grantees still filing
73/111
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA FEDERATION OF HUMANE: $57,000 · AnimalsVIRGINIA FEDERATION OF HUMANE+95 more: $857,426 · Animals+95 moreHARLAN COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE SHELTER: $38,300 · OtherSPAY TENNESSEE: $30,500 · OtherSPAY TENNESSEEFRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $28,000 · Other+91 more: $672,357 · Other+91 moreNATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $19,000 · Human ServicesFor the Cats Sake: $15,500 · Human ServicesCLOVER CAT RESCUE INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education
Animals$914,426Other$769,157Human Services$34,500Food & Nutrition$14,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA FEDERATION OF HUMANE: $57,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSpay Neuter Incentive Program of WV: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSPAY CAMPBELL COUNTY TENNESSEE PETS: $24,000 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetANIMAL ALLIANCE OF EAST KENTUCKY INC: $22,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFERAL CAT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC: $18,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE: $17,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY: $17,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetTrapper Girls Community Cat Coalition Inc: $16,250 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetHELPING HOUNDS FIND HOMESINC: $15,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetFor the Cats Sake: $15,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetUnited Spay Alliance: $15,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetHOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHATTANEUTER: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF SULLIVAN COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCLOVER CAT RESCUE INC: $14,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetFriends of Madison County Animals: $14,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetSteel Valley Woofstock Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetCHARLESTON REGIONAL SPAY NEUTER CENTER INC: $13,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetONE BY ONE ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC: $13,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSIMPLY SPAY AND NEUTER OF ROCKWOOD: $13,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE FOR ANIMALS INC: $13,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetBEAT THE HEAT ALLIANCE INC: $12,840 over 7y, 11% of budgetCOLUMBUS DOG CONNECTION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBedford Humane Society Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetPAWS of Rutherford County: $12,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetHomeless Animals Relief Project Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetCats Voice WV: $11,500 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetOPERATION TOPCAT: $11,250 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetCENTRAL VIRGINIA REGIONAL RESCUE: $11,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetANIMAL BALANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPULASKI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetProject Safe Pet: $10,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE SPAY AND NEUTER INC: $10,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetThe Spay Neuter Project: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF MORGAN COUNTY INC: $9,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF McCORMICK COUNTY: $9,250 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPAWS AND LOVE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetCOUNTRY K-9 RESCUE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetANIMAL CONTROL AND WELFARE PROJECT: $9,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SHELTER DOGS INC: $9,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetVETERINARIANS TO THE RESCUE: $8,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA FEDERATION OF HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Spay Neuter Incentive Program of WV ↗
  • Who funds SPAY CAMPBELL COUNTY TENNESSEE PETS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ALLIANCE OF EAST KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SPAY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FERAL CAT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMNER SPAY NEUTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Trapper Girls Community Cat Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HOUNDS FIND HOMESINC ↗
  • Who funds For the Cats Sake ↗
  • Who funds United Spay Alliance ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE KARE LLC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANEUTER ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF SULLIVAN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLOVER CAT RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Madison County Animals ↗
  • Who funds LOUDON COUNTY FRIENDS OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Grainger County Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds Steel Valley Woofstock Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON REGIONAL SPAY NEUTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE BY ONE ANIMAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLY SPAY AND NEUTER OF ROCKWOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petco LoveTX47.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petco Love · On Shore Foundation · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Humane World for Animals Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Dj and T Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · Best Friends Animal Society · Pedigree Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Two Mauds Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Two Mauds Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Two Mauds Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Two Mauds Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 194 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Two Mauds’ filings →

    More from the funding graph