Skip to content

· Public charity

Twice Is Nice Inc

To raise revenue to benefit seniors in need, while promoting sustainability through the resale of donated clothing, furniture, and household items.

$113k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$16k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Twice Is Nice Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Charlottesville Area Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Twice Is Nice Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $91k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
1
’18
8
’19
2
’20
2
’21
1
’22
1
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$626kHuman Services$554kFood & Nutrition$56kInternational$15kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $90,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $112,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $83k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS$15,500
BUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATION$15,000
ALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$12,000
ALL BLESSINGS FLOW$10,000
LOUISA COUNTY RESOURCE COUNCIL$10,000
PACEM$10,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE TAI CHI CENTER$10,000
LOAVES & FISHES$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $554k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JABA: $40k → 8%JABA: $40k → 8%JABA: $40k → 8%JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING: $40k → 8%JABA: $40k → 8%ALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $12k → 8%JEFFERSON ELDER CARE: $180k → 8%JEFFERSON ELDER CARE: $162k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$580k · 3 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$580k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
+96%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JE
    JEFFERSON ELDER CARE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $342k · revenue -77%
  • JA
    JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue -17%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE- ALBEMARLE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $38k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • BG
    BUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +96%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue -14%
  • LC
    Louisa County Resource Council of Louisa Virginiagraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fluvanna Meals On Wheels

The organization's purpose is to provide meals to the ederly, disabled, and homebound in fluvanna county, virginia.

Food & Nutrition
2
Farmville Area Community Emergency Services Inc

Distribution of food to qualified low-income residents of Prince Edward County, VA

—
3
Meals On Wheels of Arlington Virginia Inc

Provide meals to homebound persons who, due to age, illness, or other distress, are confined and unable to secure sustenance themselves.

—
4
Southern Area Agency On Aging

To provide services to persons over 55 in planning district 12 of virginia.

Human Services
5
Albemarle Development Corporation

Improve the quality of life for regional citizens

Human Services
6
Courage to Care Outreach Rva

Helping the homeless population

Housing & Shelter
7
Jackson County Commission On Aging Inc

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of jackson county through title iii and medicaid programs.

Human Services
8
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
9
Dickenson County Food Bank

To provide food to the needy residents of Dickenson County Virginia

Food & Nutrition
10
Loaves & Fishes Chilhowie Area Food Pantry Inc

Provide nutritious food in name of jesus christ to the hungry in the chilhowie area of virginia

Food & Nutrition
11
Meals On Wheels of Chesapeake Inc

Meals on wheels of chesapeake, inc. is a non-profit community service agency that delivers meals to the ill, handicapped, convalescent,needy (continued schedule o)

—
12
Central Virginia Alliance for Community Living Inc

Central virginia alliance for community living, inc. (cvacl) envisions a community where all individuals, regardless of age or disability, maintain independence, dignity, equal rights, and a meaningful life based on their own personal…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Interfaith Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $625,850 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONJEFFERSON ELDER CARE: $341,906 · Human ServicesJEFFERSON ELDER CAREJEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesJEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC+1 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE- ALBEMARLE: $38,300 · OtherLouisa County Resource Council of Louisa Virginia: $10,000 · HealthALL BLESSINGS FLOW INC: $10,000 · HealthBUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalCHARLOTTESVILLE T'AI CHI CENTER: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsPEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRY: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$625,850Human Services$553,906Other$38,300Health$20,000International$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Food & Nutrition$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $625,850 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJEFFERSON ELDER CARE: $341,906 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetJEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING INC: $200,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHARLOTTESVILLE- ALBEMARLE: $38,300 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLouisa County Resource Council of Louisa Virginia: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE T'AI CHI CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetPEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Charles Fund Inc · Perry Foundation Inc · The Genan Foundation · The Oak Hill Fund · Caplin Foundation · The Better Living Foundation · Whitney and Anne Stone Foundation · The Watterson Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twice Is Nice Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twice Is Nice Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Twice Is Nice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph