Loading…
· Public charity
TWICE IS NICE INC
Assist seniors in need while promoting sustainability through the resale of donated items
$236k
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
1
Communities
$196k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Philanthropy$626kHuman Services$554kHealth$20kInternational$15kHousing & Shelter$10kRecreation & Sports$10kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$38k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
facilityrepairsjefferson elder
2019
healthfoodclassescharlottesvilledisabilitieslow-incomemany
2020
non-profits mainlymainly manage
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $196k
$195,850
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$195,850
- JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING$40,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $554k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 4 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
7
Total granted
$1.2M
$75k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+64%
+52%
Still filing today
75%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyInternationalHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - COMMUNITY RECOVERY FUND4× · 2020–2024 · $626k · revenue +64%
- JEJEFFERSON ELDER CARE2× · 2017–2018 · $342k · revenue -79%
- JAJEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue -17%
Funded once
- BGBUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +16%
- AFALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · $12k
- LCLOUISA COUNTY RESOURCE COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +142%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Wiliamsburg Area Meals On Wheels
Deliver hot meals in williamsburg va area to aged, convalescent, and handicapped individuals who are unable to prepare nutritious meals for themselves.
—
2
Meals on Wheels of Chesapeake Inc
Meals on Wheels of Chesapeake, Inc. is a non-profit community service agency that delivers meals to the ill, handicapped, convalescent, needy and individuals maintaining independent living in their own homes in Chesapeake, VA.
—
3
Fluvanna Meals On Wheels
The organization's purpose is to provide meals to the elderly, disabled, and homebound in fluvanna county, virginia.
Food & Nutrition
4
Farmville Area Community Emergency
Distribution of food to qualified low-income residents of Prince Edward County, VA
—
5
Commonwealth Cares Inc
The organization provides benevolent assistance to Virginia residents to assist with rent, medical bills, funeral expenses, and expenses incurred due to emergency situations.
Human Services
6
Courage to Care Outreach Rva
Helping the homeless population
Housing & Shelter
7
Loaves & Fishes Chilhowie Area Food
Provide nutritious food in name of jesus christ to the hungry in the chilhowie area of virginia
Food & Nutrition
8
Dickenson County Food Bank
To provide food to the needy residents of Dickenson County Virginia
Food & Nutrition
9
SeniorNavigatorcom
Providing free information on community resources available to Virginians, with a focus older adults, adults with disabilities, veterans and those who care for them.
Community Improvement
10
Meals On Wheels of Jamestown Area
Provide home delivery of meals to elderly.
Food & Nutrition
11
Western Fairfax Christian Ministries
To provide food and financial support for persons at risk of hunger and homelessness living in western Fairfax County Virginia.
Human Services
12
Charlotte County Meals On Wheels
The organization purchases hot and frozen meals which are delivered by volunteers to local residents unable to cook due to advanced age or mental or physical disability. we provide 5 nutritious meals per week to approximately 40 clients.…
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alliance for Interfaith Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$625,850Human Services$553,906Other$38,300Health$20,000International$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Food & Nutrition$8,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - COMMUNITY RECOVERY FUND ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON ELDER CARE ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON AREA BOARD FOR AGING ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds BUILDING GOODNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LOUISA COUNTY RESOURCE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PACEM ↗
- Who funds ALL BLESSINGS FLOW ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE TAI CHI CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Charlottesville Area CommunityVA28.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community · The Charles Fund Inc · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · The Better Living Foundation · The Watterson Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · The Oak Hill Fund · Sentara Health · S&P Global Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation TWICE IS NICE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHARLOTTESVILLE TAI CHI CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 201001285 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CHARLOTTESVILLE TAI CHI CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Twice Is Nice Inc?
Find your warmest path to Twice Is Nice Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines