Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tw Carolyn King Ragan

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$253k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.0MHuman Services$217kEducation$145kHealth$100kHousing & Shelter$56kScience & Tech$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $127k
$25,300
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH$63,250
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$63,250
BAPTIST VILLAGE INC$30,000
SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH$25,300
BAPTIST MOBILE HEALTH MINISTRY FOUNDATIO$25,000
TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC$20,000
GEORGIA BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOMES$16,200
BREWTON PARKER COLLEGE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $25k → 36%BAPTIST MOBILE HEALTH MINISTRY FOUNDATIO: $25k → 9%TRUETT-MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%PENFIELD CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $20k → 14%EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BAPTIST CONVE: $20k → 16%BAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $38k → 18%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $63k → 15%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $23k → 36%TRUETT-MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY: $21k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $63k → 13%PENFIELD CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $20k → 14%BAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $35k → 18%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $55k → 15%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $22k → 36%TRUETT MCCONNELL COLLEGE: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $57k → 13%BAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $32k → 18%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $50k → 15%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $22k → 36%TRUETT MCCONNELL COLLEGE: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST: $55k → 13%BAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $30k → 18%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $111k → 15%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $22k → 36%TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $55k → 13%BAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $21k → 18%SOUTHERN BAPTIST: $72k → 15%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $21k → 36%TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $55k → 13%BAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $20k → 18%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $55k → 15%SILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $20k → 36%TRUETT MCCONNELL COLLEGE: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $54k → 13%SOUTHERN BAPTIST: $55k → 15%TRUETT MCCONNELL COLLEGE: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST: $52k → 13%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $54k → 15%TRUETT-MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $50k → 13%SOUTHERN BAPTIST: $52k → 15%SECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST: $49k → 13%BAPTIST CONVENTION OF THE STATE OF: $25k → 13%BAPTIST MOBILE HEALTH MINISTRY INC: $25k → 13%BAPTIST CONVENTION OF THE: $22k → 13%SILOAM CHURCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $22k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+44%

Still filing today

27%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $111k · revenue +4%
  • BC
    BREWTON-PARKER COLLEGE INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +67%
  • YS
    YOUNG STREET COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BC
    BAPTIST CONVENTION OF THE STATE OF
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • SC
    SILOAM CHURCH INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • EC
    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BAPTIST CONVE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $387,500 · OtherSOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYSECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCH: $333,750 · OtherSECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST CHURCHBAPTIST VILLAGE INC: $211,880 · OtherBAPTIST VILLAGE INCIndividual grant recipient: $178,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSILOAM BAPTIST CHURCH: $174,200 · OtherSILOAM BAPTIST CHURCHSECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTIST: $155,500 · OtherSECOND PONCE DE LEON BAPTISTTRUETT MCCONNELL COLLEGE: $80,000 · OtherPENFIELD CHRISTIAN HOMES INC: $70,500 · Other+13 more: $297,920 · Other+13 moreTRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC: $111,000 · EducationYOUNG STREET COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $5,000 · ReligionHebron Community Health Center Inc: $5,000 · Health
Other$1,889,750Education$111,000Religion$5,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC: $111,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBREWTON-PARKER COLLEGE INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG STREET COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $5,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREWTON-PARKER COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG STREET COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds Hebron Community Health Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tw Carolyn King Ragan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tw Carolyn King Ragan. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tw Carolyn King Ragan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph