Skip to content

· Public charity

Tulsa Economic Development Corporation

Tbdc was founded in 1979 as Tulsa Economic Development Corporation, an organization charged with promoting and sustaining small business growth in tulsa.

$41k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Human Services$33MPublic Safety & Disaster$14MHealth$4.8MFood & Nutrition$2.6MEmployment$779kArts & Culture$465kInternational$300kCommunity Improvement$165kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $25,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $41,045 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,045 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VFW Post 3077$15,000
Tulsa's Future Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Oklahoma Baptist Homes for Children: $150k → 16%Emergency Infant Services: $460k → 15%Tulsa Cornerstone Assistance Network: $25k → 15%LIFE Senior Services: $144k → 15%Oklahoma Heart Gallery Inc: $10k → 15%Gatesway Foundation Inc: $250k → 15%Growing Together: $98k → 15%Tulsa Boys' Home: $40k → 15%Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $50k → 15%Connected Kids Inc: $15k → 15%Greenwood Cultural Center: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
4
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
5
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
6
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
7
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
8
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
10
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
11
Fcc Child Development Center Inc Dba Growing Kidz

The fcc child development center (cdc) opened its doors september 8, 1987 with the primary purpose of providing quality childcare to those families living and working in the downtown tulsa area and surrounding areas. the cdc provides full…

—
12
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 12 & 12 Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prison Discipleship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 687 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/46
Grantees still filing
25/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+187 more: $30,160,200 · Other+187 moreCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $829,605 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $700,000 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move Inc: $225,000 · Food & NutritionEmergency Infant Services Inc: $459,515 · Human ServicesGatesway Foundation Inc: $250,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $144,000 · Human ServicesGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC: $353,600 · EmploymentNEW WORKFORCE DIRECTIONS INC: $150,000 · EmploymentTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentBroken Arrow Economic Development Corporation: $155,310 · Community ImprovementCOUNSELING & RECOVERY SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $125,000 · HealthTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $125,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$30,160,200Food & Nutrition$1,754,605Human Services$1,003,515Employment$503,600Youth Development$250,000Community Improvement$155,310Health$125,000Housing & Shelter$125,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $829,605 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $700,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $459,515 over 1y, 12% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC: $353,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGatesway Foundation Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $250,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetFood on the Move Inc: $225,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetBroken Arrow Economic Development Corporation: $155,310 over 1y, 25% of budgetHOBBY LOBBY STORES INC MEDICAL & DENTAL PLAN TRUST: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW WORKFORCE DIRECTIONS INC: $150,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC: $145,800 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $144,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOUNSELING & RECOVERY SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget12 & 12 INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $125,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds Gatesway Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Food on the Move Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK64.2× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Flint Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tulsa Economic Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tulsa Economic Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Tulsa Glass Blowing Studio Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 687 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $170k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tulsa Economic Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph