Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tufenkian Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$647k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$544k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.5MInternational$1.2MEmployment$829kHuman Services$574kReligion$456kPublic Safety & Disaster$434kPublic Benefit$263kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $544k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$106k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TUFENKIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$544,172
Individual grant recipient$35,250
Individual grant recipient$7,500
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY DEVELOPEMENT$4,000
HOPE FOR NEW YORK$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
MOTHER JONES INVESTIGATIVE FUND$3,500
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$3,000
OPEN HANDS LEGAL SERVICES INC$3,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$3,000
THE SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPORATION$3,000
THE BRONX DEFENDDERS$2,500
HAMAZKAYIN ARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL ENDOWMENT FUND$2,500
BRENNAN CENTER$2,500
ARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 62% of grant dollars ($4.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 38% that went abroad ($3.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE GENOCIDE EDUCATION PROJECT: $2k → 10%THE GENOCIDE EDUCATION PROJECT: $1k → 10%HAMAZKAYIN ARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL ENDOWMENT FUND: $3k → 14%GURGEN MELIKYAN MULTICHILDREN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AR
DC
AL
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 38% of all-years giving ($3.0M)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Armenia$2.0M · 26 grants
Germany$954k · 2 grants
United Kingdom$13k · 2 grants
Canada$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Tufenkian Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 26%.

Tufenkian Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 69% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 46 repeat orgs$580k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
53

Total granted

$7.2M
$565k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+2%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOPE FOR NEW YORK
    6× · 2018–2024 · $34k · revenue +24%
  • AA
    ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $27k · revenue +52%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • WS
    WOMEN'S SUPPORT CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $171k
  • TP
    THE PHILOS PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $130k · revenue -13%
  • HP
    HAYRENASER PROJECT
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Armenian National Institute Inc

To promote understanding of the armenian genocide through research, analysis, publication, and public forums; to collect and organize documentation attesting to and preserving the memory of the armenian genocide; and to increase public…

International
2
Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights

Alc seeks to secure justice for those who have suffered war crimes as a result of the unprovoked attack by azerbaijan on nagorno-karabagh during 2020 and 2023 including bringing cases, working with other not-for-profits, before the…

International
3
Coalition for Democracy and Human Rights in Iran
Civil Rights
4
Global Arm Foundation

Education about armenia & caucasu region

Philanthropy
5
Armenian General Benevolent Union

Ensuring the prosperity and well-being of all armenians.

—
6
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
7
American University of Armenia Corporation

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Aurora Humanitarian Initiative Foundation Inc

To support people and promote global projects tackling the needs of the most helpless and destitute Aurora is rooted in the events of the Armenian Genocide one hundred years ago and the enhancement of its position in the world's memory. We…

Arts & Culture
11
Armenian Film Society

Armenian film society celebrates armenian culture through year-round programming of film screenings, discussions, workshop, and lectures. it shines a spotlight on armenian films and filmmakers, as week as films that deal with armenian…

Arts & Culture
12
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Soh Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/40
Grantees still filing
22/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION: $3,798,965 · OtherTHE TUFENKIAN FOUNDATIONTHE TUFENKIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,395,025 · OtherTHE TUFENKIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONNK PROJECT: $954,073 · OtherNK PROJECT+78 more: $1,252,096 · Other+78 moreTHE PHILOS PROJECT INC: $130,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $4,500 · Arts & CultureARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $27,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 · InternationalATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $10,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $8,500 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $8,000 · InternationalTHE CIVILITAS FOUNDATION: $2,472 · International+3 more: $4,000 · InternationalHOPE FOR NEW YORK: $34,000 · PhilanthropyONE ARMENIA INC: $10,250 · PhilanthropyMY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyTHE BRONX DEFENDERS: $23,000 · Crime & LegalOpen Hands Legal Services Inc: $12,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $2,500 · Crime & LegalPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $2,000 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $26,500 · Civil RightsCODE 3 ANGELS: $22,805 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$7,400,159Arts & Culture$134,500International$70,472Philanthropy$51,750Crime & Legal$39,500Civil Rights$26,500Public Safety & Disaster$22,805

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PHILOS PROJECT INC: $130,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOPE FOR NEW YORK: $34,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSojourners Inc: $33,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $26,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRONX DEFENDERS: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCODE 3 ANGELS: $22,805 over 2y, 51% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGURGEN MELIKYAN MULTICHILDREN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Hands Legal Services Inc: $12,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetONE ARMENIA INC: $10,250 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMY BROTHER'S KEEPER INC: $7,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetTHE GENOCIDE EDUCATION PROJECT: $3,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOH USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CIVILITAS FOUNDATION: $2,472 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Academy For Christian Thought: $2,200 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArmenia Fund USA Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetARMENIAN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS OF AMERICA INC: $850 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRise Up: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HALO TRUST (USA) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL IMPACT FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOICE OF ARMENIANS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PHILOS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Sojourners Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE BRONX DEFENDERS ↗
  • Who funds CODE 3 ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds GURGEN MELIKYAN MULTICHILDREN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Open Hands Legal Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ARMENIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Armenian American Medical Association ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Afeyan Family FoundationDE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Afeyan Family Foundation · Ucla Foundation · K George & Carolann Najarian Charitable Foundation · Bedrosian Foundation · Mina & Hacob Shirvanian Family Foundation Inc · The Vahik & Alice Petrossian Foundation · Jhm Charitable Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tufenkian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tufenkian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tufenkian Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tufenkian Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tufenkian’s filings →

More from the funding graph