Skip to content
Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$201kHealth$152kHuman Services$49kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AT Still University$15,000
Midwestern University$15,000
Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine$15,000
Tucson Medical Center Foundation$7,000
El Rio Health Center Foundation Inc$7,000
The Haven$5,000
Tucson Postpartum Depression Coalition$3,500
Pima Council on Aging$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Arivaca Human Resource: $8k → 15%Arivaca Human Resource: $8k → 15%St Luke's Home: $5k → 15%St Luke's Home: $3k → 15%Easterseals Blake Foundation: $8k → 15%Pima Council on Aging: $3k → 15%St Luke's Home: $2k → 15%Eastside Neighbors Volunteer Program: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$346k · 15 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
21

Total granted

$346k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+78%

Still filing today

73%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    A T Still University of Health Sciences
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +29%
  • MU
    Midwestern University
    5× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +11%
  • AH
    Arivaca Human Resources
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • EB
    EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -5%
  • TH
    Touchstone Health Services
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • IH
    Integrative Healthcare Solutions
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
American Indian Association of Tucson Inc

Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.

Human Services
4
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
The Dons of Arizona
Education
7
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
8
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
9
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Improving the health of our community through comprehensive, accessible, affordable, quality, and compassionate care.

Health
10
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
11
Arizona Public Health Association

A nonprofit professional organization working to improve the health of Arizona communities through advocacy, education, and professional development.

Health
12
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Arizona Healthiest State Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New Mexico State University: $75,000 · OtherNew Mexico State UniversityMidwestern University-AZCOM: $25,000 · OtherMidwestern University-AZCOMAT Still University-SOMA: $25,000 · OtherAT Still University-SOMATHE HAVEN: $12,500 · OtherTHE HAVENTUCSON POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION COALITION: $7,000 · OtherTouchstone Health Services: $6,850 · Other+7 more: $19,000 · Other+7 moreA T Still University of Health Sciences: $67,500 · EducationA T Still University of Health SciencesMidwestern University: $67,500 · EducationMidwestern UniversityCULTURE OF PEACE ALLIANCE INC: $13,360 · EducationCULTURE OF PEACE ALLIANCE INC+1 more: $2,500 · EducationTMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthTMC HEALTH …BEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $6,700 · HealthBEADS OF CO…Saavi Services for the Blind: $6,500 · HealthSaavi Servi…Green Valley Assistance Services Inc: $6,500 · HealthGreen Valle…Tucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network: $3,475 · HealthTucson Inte…AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OSTEOPATHY: $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN AC…Bag It: $1,500 · HealthIntegrative Touch: $1,500 · HealthTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $1,500 · HealthCandlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern Arizona: $1,500 · HealthArizona Youth Partnership: $1,500 · HealthArivaca Human Resources: $15,000 · Human ServicesArivaca H…St Lukes in the Desert Inc: $9,900 · Human ServicesSt Lukes …EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesEASTERSEA…Pima Council on Aging: $2,500 · Human ServicesPima Coun…EASTSIDE NEIGHBORS VOLUNTEER PROGRAM: $1,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys to Men Tucson Inc: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC: $4,915 · Food & NutritionLIVING STREETS ALLIANCE: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$170,350Education$150,860Health$42,175Human Services$36,400Youth Development$8,000Philanthropy$7,000Food & Nutrition$4,915Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences: $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University: $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetArivaca Human Resources: $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCULTURE OF PEACE ALLIANCE INC: $13,360 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $9,900 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEADS OF COURAGE INC DBA CENTER FOR ARTS IN NURSING: $6,700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSaavi Services for the Blind: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreen Valley Assistance Services Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY GARDENS OF TUCSON INC: $4,915 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network: $3,475 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF OSTEOPATHY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ARIZONA ROADRUNNERS CLUB: $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBag It: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIntegrative Touch: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILL2WALK FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys to Men Tucson Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCandlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation of Southern Arizona: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetArizona Youth Partnership: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING STREETS ALLIANCE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Connie Hillman Family…The Hs Lopez Family F…Arizona Community Fou…United Way of Tucson …Angel Charity for Chi…Jewish Community Foun…Tucson Medical CenterTmc Health FoundationNicholas W Genematas …Fred & Christine Arms…Social Venture Partne…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ51.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Angel Charity for Children Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Tucson Medical Center · Tmc Health Foundation · Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation · Fred & Christine Armstrong Foundation · Social Venture Partners Tucson

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tucson Osteopathic Medical’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home