Skip to content
Tuality Healthcare at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Tuality Healthcare

TUALITY HEALTHCARE's mission is to provide health care to the community with respect for human dignity and without regard for the recipient's ability to pay.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$587kRecreation & Sports$60kCommunity Improvement$53kHuman Services$27kArts & Culture$15kEducation$15k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $44,835, the rows itemized in this filing. The $52,279 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,444 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$18,970
Median grant
1
States reached
$237M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT ACCESS NOW$20,701
HEALTH SHARE OF OREGON$18,970
WASHINGTON COUNTY$5,164
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Community Action Organization: $10k → 8%Community Action Organization: $10k → 8%Community Action Organization: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$711k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Project Access Now
    7× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +339%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $138k · revenue +33%
  • CH
    COMAGINE HEALTH
    4× · 2020–2023 · $78k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • PU
    PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • OI
    OREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +95%
  • FC
    FAITH COMMUNITY NURSINGHEALTH MINISTRIES NORTHWEST
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Quality Health Network

To optimize the whole-person health of the more than 400,000 residents of the western colorado medical trade area qhn serves. qhn's health information exchange (hie) improves the efficiency, timeliness, and quality of the healthcare…

Health
2
Careoregon Inc

To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.

Health
3
Coalition of Community Health Clinics

The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…

Health
4
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Hazleton

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and clinical research.

Health
5
Pacmed Clinics

Our mission is to provide respectful, high-quality, patient-focused healthcare to each person and to the communities we serve. pacmed welcomes patients from the well insured to those who cannot afford healthcare.

Health
6
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
7
Washington Regional Medical Center

Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.

Health
8
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
9
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
10
Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades

To improve the health and wellness of the medically uninsured or critically underserved through the engagement of professionals, community partners, and dedicated volunteers.

Health
11
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
12
Oregon Public Health Association

Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Access Now; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Project Access Now: $201,798 · HealthProject Access NowAmerican Heart Association Inc: $137,844 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncHEALTH SHARE OF OREGON: $34,526 · HealthHEALTH SHARE OF OREGONVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $29,725 · HealthVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER+1 more: $5,000 · HealthCOMAGINE HEALTH: $77,556 · OtherCOMAGINE HEALTHOREGON HEALTH CARE QUALITY CORPORATION: $58,648 · OtherOREGON HEALTH CARE QUALITY CORPORATIONWashington County Chamber of Commerce: $42,216 · OtherWashington County Chamber of CommerceSouthwest Community Health Center: $30,000 · OtherSouthwest Community Health CenterCITY OF HILLSBORO: $18,000 · OtherCITY OF HILLSBOROCENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $13,100 · Other+4 more: $22,344 · Other+4 moreHILLSBORO TUESDAY MARKET PLACE INC DBA HILLSBORO TUESDAY NIGHT MARKET: $41,500 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $26,500 · Human ServicesPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationOREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INC: $7,800 · Arts & Culture
Health$408,893Other$261,864Recreation & Sports$41,500Human Services$26,500Education$10,000Arts & Culture$7,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Access Now: $201,798 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $137,844 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMAGINE HEALTH: $77,556 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON HEALTH CARE QUALITY CORPORATION: $58,648 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWashington County Chamber of Commerce: $42,216 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHILLSBORO TUESDAY MARKET PLACE INC DBA HILLSBORO TUESDAY NIGHT MARKET: $41,500 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetHEALTH SHARE OF OREGON: $34,526 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthwest Community Health Center: $30,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $29,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $26,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $13,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INC: $7,800 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAITH COMMUNITY NURSINGHEALTH MINISTRIES NORTHWEST: $7,180 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVision Action Network: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF HILLSBORO: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Providence Health & S…The Hillsboro Communi…Careoregon IncThe Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Oregon Community …Legacy HealthHoover Family Foundat…United Way of the Col…OCF Joseph E Weston P…American Online Givin…
Providence Health & Services - OregonWA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Hillsboro Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Legacy Health · Hoover Family Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tuality Healthcare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tuality Healthcare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Community Action Organization: 67% of income from government
  • Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center: 11% of income from government
  • Pacific University: 2% of income from government
  • Project Access Now: 2% of income from government
  • Centro Cultural of Washington County: 0% of income from government
  • Health Share of Oregon: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tuality Healthcare’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home