· Public charity
Tuality Healthcare
TUALITY HEALTHCARE's mission is to provide health care to the community with respect for human dignity and without regard for the recipient's ability to pay.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $44,835 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $52,279 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,444 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT ACCESS NOW | $20,701 |
| HEALTH SHARE OF OREGON | $18,970 |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY | $5,164 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Project Access Now7× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +339%- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc3× · 2021–2023 · $138k · revenue +33%
- CHCOMAGINE HEALTH4× · 2020–2023 · $78k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- PUPACIFIC UNIVERSITYone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +7%
- OIOREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +95%
- FCFAITH COMMUNITY NURSINGHEALTH MINISTRIES NORTHWESTone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To optimize the whole-person health of the more than 400,000 residents of the western colorado medical trade area qhn serves. qhn's health information exchange (hie) improves the efficiency, timeliness, and quality of the healthcare…
To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.
The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…
We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and clinical research.
Our mission is to provide respectful, high-quality, patient-focused healthcare to each person and to the communities we serve. pacmed welcomes patients from the well insured to those who cannot afford healthcare.
Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.
Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.
We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
To improve the health and wellness of the medically uninsured or critically underserved through the engagement of professionals, community partners, and dedicated volunteers.
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…
Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Access Now and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Project Access Now ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds COMAGINE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds OREGON HEALTH CARE QUALITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Washington County Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds HILLSBORO TUESDAY MARKET PLACE INC DBA HILLSBORO TUESDAY NIGHT MARKET ↗
- Who funds HEALTH SHARE OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds Southwest Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OREGON INTERNATIONAL AIRSHOW INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH COMMUNITY NURSINGHEALTH MINISTRIES NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Vision Action Network ↗
- Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF HILLSBORO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Hillsboro Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Legacy Health · Hoover Family Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tuality Healthcare funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
- Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center — 11% of income from government
- Pacific University — 2% of income from government
- Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
- Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
- Health Share of Oregon — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.