Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tua Raymond R Heiles Irr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$99kReligion$62kHuman Services$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$24kEducation$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,211
Median grant
5
States reached
$769k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,591
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$3,211
MILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FAS$3,211
WYOMING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,211
MARCH OF DIMES INC$3,211
DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER FDN$3,211
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEWARK INC$3,211
THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$3,211
Individual grant recipient$3,211
NJIT$3,211
YMCA$3,211
UNITED WAY ESSEX W HUDSON$3,211
THE SALVATION ARMY$3,211
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CT
CO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$318k · 14 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$318k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+22%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2018–2025 · $25k · revenue +9%
  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +123%
  • MS
    MILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST AID SQUAD INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • DH
    DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +22%
  • HE
    HEALTHY EYES ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2018 · $700
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

The spirit that infuses newark beth israel medical center and children's hospital of new jersey is its commitment to excellence. our mission is to achieve this excellence through: - the delivery of primary health care to all who need our…

Health
2
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
3
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
4
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
5
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
6
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc-Subordinates

The organizations are committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
7
Rwj Barnabas Health Inc

Rwj barnabas health, inc. operates as the parent entity of a tax-exempt multi-entity healthcare system. the organization coordinates, supervises and ensures the continuation and improvement of the quality of healthcare services in a cost…

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
Saint Peters Healthcare System Inc

Saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is a not for-profit holding company based in new brunswick, new jersey. saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is the sole corporate member of a number of not for-profit entities and the sole…

—
10
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Deborah Heart and Lung Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $29,229 · OtherOLD FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUNITED WAY ESSEX W HUDSON: $25,137 · OtherUNITED WAY ESSEX W HUDSONWYOMING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $24,337 · OtherWYOMING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $24,337 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYYMCA: $24,337 · OtherYMCAIndividual grant recipient: $24,337 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER FDN: $22,236 · OtherDEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER FDNNJIT - BETH S KORNSTEIN: $8,610 · Other+2 more: $3,911 · OtherMARCH OF DIMES INC: $24,337 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCMILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $24,337 · HealthMILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUN…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $24,337 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHI…DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER: $2,908 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,137 · Human ServicesTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC: $24,337 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $12,516 · Education
Other$186,471Health$75,919Human Services$25,137Youth Development$24,337Education$12,516

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,137 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $24,337 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC: $24,337 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $24,337 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $24,337 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $12,516 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER: $2,908 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY EYES ALLIANCE: $700 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST AID SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION AT NJ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH HEART AND LUNG CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY EYES ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tua Raymond R Heiles Irr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tua Raymond R Heiles Irr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Deborah Heart and Lung Center: 1% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tua Raymond R Heiles Irr’s filings →

More from the funding graph