Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ttees the Edith W Mac Guire Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$602k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Civil Rights$714kAnimals$626kInternational$425kEnvironment$294kArts & Culture$177kHousing & Shelter$172kHealth$156kYouth Development$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $224k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $328k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$50,000
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN$40,000
CHENANGO COUNTY SPCA$30,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,000
WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL$25,000
TOO YOUNG TO WED$25,000
WOMEN FOR AFGHAN WOMEN$25,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$20,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES$20,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
SANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TOO YOUNG TO WED: $25k → 9%CHENANGO COUNTY SPCA: $30k → 12%WOMEN FOR AFGHAN WOMEN: $25k → 13%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE: $15k → 17%PURE THEATRE: $25k → 12%CLINIC FOR REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE: $15k → 9%SANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $15k → 11%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $76k → 18%TOO YOUNG TO WED: $20k → 9%CHENANGO COUNTY SPCA: $20k → 12%WOMEN FOR AFGHAN WOMEN: $20k → 13%CLINIC FOR REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE: $15k → 9%DING DARLING WILDLIFE: $15k → 11%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $75k → 18%TOO YOUNG TO WED: $20k → 9%CHENANGO COUNTY SPCA: $20k → 12%WOMEN FOR AFGHAN WOMEN: $15k → 13%DING DARLING WILDLIFE: $15k → 11%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $50k → 18%TOO YOUNG TO WED: $15k → 9%SANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $15k → 11%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $45k → 18%SOUTHERN PEVERTY LAW CENTER: $37k → 18%SOUTHERN PEVERTY LAW CENTER: $35k → 18%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $33k → 18%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $30k → 18%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $30k → 18%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $20k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $20k → 17%NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN: $40k → 14%NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN: $27k → 14%NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN: $27k → 14%NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN: $25k → 14%NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN: $21k → 14%NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN: $20k → 14%NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%NATIONAL ORGINIZATION FOR WOMEN NOW: $20k → 14%WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $40k → 14%WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 14%DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE: $20k → 14%WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 14%JERICHO PROJECT: $75k → 17%JERICHO PROJECT: $25k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $25k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $20k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $20k → 17%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
MD
KS
TN
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 76 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

76 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
33

Total granted

$2.8M
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+26%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +10%
  • JP
    JERICHO PROJECT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +350%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • PT
    Pure Theatre
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +10%
  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBETgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +48%
  • TH
    TIGER HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
6
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
7
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
8
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
9
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
10
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
11
American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign

The american wild horse campaign is the nation's leading conservation organization dedicated to preserving the freedom and habitat of wild horses and burros. through its initiatives in advocacy, conservation, land preservation, and legal…

Animals
12
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pure Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterWomen & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyLocal Food System Organizat…Equine Therapy ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%45%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/75
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/73
Grantees still filing
53/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN — $118,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMENWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $100,000 · OtherWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONALPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $80,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODSANIBEL HISTORICAL MUSEUM — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $49,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $56,500 · Other+60 more — $938,675 · Other+60 moreSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $410,100 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERT…CHENANGO COUNTY SPCA — $70,000 · AnimalsCHENANGO COUNTY…Defenders of Wildlife — $63,500 · AnimalsDefenders of Wi…CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $55,000 · AnimalsCLINIC FOR THE …ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $40,500 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DE…EAST COAST EXOTIC ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $33,500 · AnimalsEAST COAST EXOT…HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION — $30,500 · AnimalsHUMANE FARMING …FARM SANCTUARY INC — $29,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY …+12 more — $73,100 · Animals+12 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $90,000 · InternationalInternation…Women for Afghan Women Inc — $70,000 · InternationalWomen for A…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $50,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $49,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…THE CARTER CENTER INC — $40,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER …+4 more — $10,000 · InternationalNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $25,500 · EnvironmentFLYING CLOUD INSTITUTE INC — $21,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $15,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $15,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $11,500 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $11,000 · Environment+3 more — $3,350 · EnvironmentToo Young to Wed Inc — $80,000 · Arts & CultureTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC — $40,500 · Arts & CulturePure Theatre — $25,000 · Arts & CultureJERICHO PROJECT — $111,600 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,452,175Crime & Legal$410,100Animals$395,100International$309,500Environment$152,850Arts & Culture$145,500Housing & Shelter$111,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $410,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJERICHO PROJECT — $111,600 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc — $80,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCHENANGO COUNTY SPCA — $70,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife — $63,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $56,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $49,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $49,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN INC — $41,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTYPE MEDIA CENTER INC — $40,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $40,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC — $35,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $35,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fund for Animals Inc — $34,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEAST COAST EXOTIC ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $33,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC — $30,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $30,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $30,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION — $30,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC — $29,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE — $27,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT — $25,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MARLBOROUGH LAND TRUST INC — $25,100 over 9y, 13% of budgetPure Theatre — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLYING CLOUD INSTITUTE INC — $21,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $15,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER PRESERVATION CENTER INC — $15,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC — $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRIDEROCK WILDLIFE REFUGE — $11,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIZZY'S LOVE EQUINE RESCUE INC — $8,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JERICHO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Too Young to Wed Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHENANGO COUNTY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TYPE MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds The Fund for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAST COAST EXOTIC ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE FARMING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amg Charitable Gift F…Edwin D Marks Animal …PC Fund for Animals C…Joyce a Ward Foundati…Amica Companies Found…Paula Knickerbocker F…The Susan and Ford Sc…Grace and Li Yu Famil…Surendra and Karen Gu…Bradford Family Found…The Gerald B Shreiber…Farrell Family Founda…
Amg Charitable Gift FoundationCO22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Farrell Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ttees the Edith W Mac Guire Char Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Flying Cloud Institute Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ttees the Edith W Mac Guire Char Tr?

Find your warmest path to Ttees the Edith W Mac Guire Char Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines