· Private foundation
Ttee Uw Jessie Smith Darrah-Charita
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $191k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA OF JAMESTOWN | $50,000 |
| CHRIST FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA | $40,000 |
| NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| JAMESTOWN PENDERGAST LIBRARY | $17,000 |
| YWCA OF JAMESTOWN | $15,000 |
| CHAUTAUQUA STRIDERS | $15,000 |
| UNITED CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY NETWORK | $15,000 |
| FUND FOR THE ARTS OF CHAUTAUQUA | $13,500 |
| WINIFRED CRAWFORD DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS | $13,000 |
| REG LENNA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC | $12,000 |
| ST SUSAN CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| AUDUBON COMMUNITY NATURE CENTER | $10,000 |
| CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION | $10,000 |
| JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $386k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF Jamestown NEW YORK6× · 2020–2025 · $291k · revenue +17%
- UWUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC6× · 2020–2025 · $260k · revenue +2%
- CSCHAUTAUQUA STRIDERS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- TGTHE GERRY HOMESone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +10%
- UCUCAN CITY MISSIONone grant, 2020 · $20k
- CWCHAUTAUQUA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide quality health care services by operating diagnostic and treatment facilities pursuant to article 28 of the public health law of new york state. the center operates clinics in dunkirk, new york, jamestown, new york, gowanda, new…
To create a business environment in the region where our members can thrive.
The ridgway chautauqua is a 501 (c) 3 non-profit community-based organization focused on offering and supporting programs that promote lifelong learning, the arts, culture and community and that embody the chautauqua tradition. our…
Improving the quality of chautauqua lake, located in chautauqua county in upstate new york. the organization is concerned about the water quality, especially the proliferation of weeds and algae and their accumulation near the shore and…
The mental health association in chautauqua county commits to radical acceptance, empowerment, and advocacy for our community members who struggle with mental health and substance use.
Lclc provides opportunities for spiritual growth, renewal and christ-centered community in the wonder of god's creation.
Provide religious, educational, cultural, recreational, and municipal services.
The agency's mission is to provide a program of services for frail or impaired older adults in a secure group setting, enhancing quality of life, delaying institutionalization and providing respite for caregivers.
The alliance was formed for the purpose of working in collaboration with lake and watershed-related organizations, municipalities, and other stakeholders in chautauqua county, ny, to promote and facilitate implementation of recommendations…
To provide a loving relationship with trained caregivers and to offer the best environmental conditions and materials with which children can explore and experiment; to see their culture and language valued; and to have their caregivers…
The united way of northern chautauqua co inc envisions a community that works together, striving to improve the lives of others, while promoting ideals that facilitate lasting positive changes. empowering our local communities through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chautauqua Watershed Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Impact Campus Fellowship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 28. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 5% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF Jamestown NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA STRIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds AUDUBON COMMUNITY NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT CAMPUS FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds REG LENNA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GERRY HOMES ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA WATERSHED CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Advocates For Balance At Chautauqua Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF JAMESTOWN ↗
- Who funds THE RELIEF ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERT H JACKSON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TRUTH IN NATURE INC ↗
- Who funds ROGER TORY PETERSON INSTITUTE OF NA ↗
- Who funds ST SUSAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chautauqua Region Community Foundation Inc · Ralph C Sheldon Foundation Inc · Carnahan-Jackson Foundation · Reginald a & Elizabeth S Lenna Fdn Inc Dba Lenna Foundation · Hultquist Foundation Inc · Holmberg Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Snow Family Foundation · Chautauqua Region Economic Development Corporation · United Way of Southern Chautauqua County Inc · The Western New York Foundation · The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ttee Uw Jessie Smith Darrah-Charita funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ttee Uw Jessie Smith Darrah-Charita?
Find your warmest path to Ttee Uw Jessie Smith Darrah-Charita through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.