Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$141k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$41k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Chautauqua Region Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $141k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
7
18
5
19
6
20
6
21
5
22
4
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$2.9MArts & Culture$280kCommunity Improvement$37kEducation$15kCrime & Legal$8kHealth$2kAnimals$1kOther$361k
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $113k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION$40,500
DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$35,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY$27,000
YMCA$10,000
FILLING THE GAP INC$7,500
JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL$5,000
JCC FOUNDATION$5,000
YMCA$3,000
CHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,000
FALCONER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $51k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $41k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $41k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $36k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $36k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $36k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION: $30k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2.7M → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $37k → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $36k → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $35k → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $35k → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $35k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $33k → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $32k → 18%DIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $32k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $28k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $27k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $27k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $26k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $25k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY: $22k → 18%YMCA: $13k → 18%YMCA: $10k → 18%YWCA: $10k → 18%FILLING THE GAP INC: $8k → 18%YMCA: $8k → 18%FILLING THE GAP INC: $8k → 18%FILLING THE GAP INC: $8k → 18%INFINITY VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $7k → 18%NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER: $7k → 18%JCC FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%UNITED CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $6k → 18%THE RESOURCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 18%THE RESOURCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 18%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL: $5k → 18%YMCA: $5k → 18%YMCA: $5k → 18%FILLING THE GAP INC: $5k → 18%YMCA: $5k → 18%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL: $5k → 18%INFINITY VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $5k → 18%FILLING THE GAP INC: $5k → 18%JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL: $5k → 18%JCC FOUNDATION: $5k → 18%CHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 18%YMCA: $3k → 18%FALCONER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$871k · 13 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$871k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+138%

Still filing today

54%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationCrime & LegalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $269k · revenue +83%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $187k · revenue +25%
  • FT
    FILLING THE GAP INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $37k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $5k · revenue -77%
  • CC
    CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +138%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chautauqua County Chamber of Commerce

To create a business environment in the region where our members can thrive.

Community Improvement
2
The Chautauqua Center Inc

To provide quality health care services by operating diagnostic and treatment facilities pursuant to article 28 of the public health law of new york state. the center operates clinics in dunkirk, new york, jamestown, new york, gowanda, new…

Health
3
Chautauqua Lake and Watershed Management Alliance Inc

The alliance was formed for the purpose of working in collaboration with lake and watershed-related organizations, municipalities, and other stakeholders in chautauqua county, ny, to promote and facilitate implementation of recommendations…

Environment
4
Chautauqua Connections Inc

To ensure that children with special needs, or at risk, from birth to age five, will reach their optimal development.

Community Improvement
5
Ridgway Chautauqua Dba the New Sherbino Theater

The ridgway chautauqua is a 501 (c) 3 non-profit community-based organization focused on offering and supporting programs that promote lifelong learning, the arts, culture and community and that embody the chautauqua tradition. our…

Arts & Culture
6
Chautauqua Home Rehabilitation & Improvement Corp

To improve the quality of housing stock and appearance of communities of chautauqua county and to improve the living conditions of the county's low-income residents.

Housing & Shelter
7
Mental Health Association in Chautauqua County Inc

The mental health association in chautauqua county commits to radical acceptance, empowerment, and advocacy for our community members who struggle with mental health and substance use.

Health
8
Chautauqua-Cattaraugus Library System

Ccls is a 36 member cooperative public library system chartered by the nys education department to foster, strengthen, and improve public library services within chautauqua and cattaraugus counties by providing its members with training,…

Education
9
Chautauqua Adult Day Care Centers Inc

The agency's mission is to provide a program of services for frail or impaired older adults in a secure group setting, enhancing quality of life, delaying institutionalization and providing respite for caregivers.

Human Services
10
Chautauqua Lake Partnership Inc

Improving the quality of chautauqua lake, located in chautauqua county in upstate new york. the organization is concerned about the water quality, especially the proliferation of weeds and algae and their accumulation near the shore and…

Environment
11
Chautauqua Lake Triathlon Coalition Inc
Recreation & Sports
12
Chautauqua Children's Safety Education Village Inc

To teach children about their responsibilities whenever they ride a bus, pedal a bike, or walk down a street, thus helping children develop a positive attitude about traffic safety.

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chautauqua Region Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Christian Advocacy Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,725,126 · PhilanthropyCHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC — $187,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INCDIBERT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $241,500 · OtherDIBERT BOYS…YMCA — $58,000 · OtherYMCA+6 more — $61,000 · Other+6 moreCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION — $269,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $9,000 · Arts & CultureFILLING THE GAP INC — $37,000 · Community ImprovementJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL — $15,000 · EducationUNITED CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $8,000 · Crime & LegalCHAUTAUQUA BLIND ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 · HealthCHAUTAUQUA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$2,912,126Other$360,500Arts & Culture$278,000Community Improvement$37,000Education$15,000Crime & Legal$8,000Health$2,000Animals$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,725,126 over 7y, 22% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION — $269,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC — $187,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetFILLING THE GAP INC — $37,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINFINITY VISUAL & PERFORMING ARTS INC — $12,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $8,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE THEATRE OF JAMESTOWN INC — $4,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA BLIND ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA INSTITUTION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FILLING THE GAP INC
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY LEARNING COUNCIL
  • Who funds INFINITY VISUAL & PERFORMING ARTS INC
  • Who funds UNITED CHRISTIAN ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMEDY CENTER INC
  • Who funds LITTLE THEATRE OF JAMESTOWN INC
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA BLIND ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chautauqua Region Community Foundation IncNY24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chautauqua Region Community Foundation Inc · Reginald a & Elizabeth S Lenna Fdn Inc Dba Lenna Foundation · Ralph C Sheldon Foundation Inc · Ttee Uw Jessie Smith Darrah-Charita · Hultquist Foundation Inc · Carnahan-Jackson Foundation · Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · United Way of Southern Chautauqua County Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Winifred Crawford Dibert Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph