Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tso Nw

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$494kHousing & Shelter$70kYouth Development$7kPublic Benefit$7kEducation$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $101k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$208k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES$41,400
CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CE$30,000
CDM SERVICES$30,000
NW VETERANS IN TECHNOLOGY$7,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$7,000
MIKE AMODEO FISHERMAN FOR VETERANS$5,000
GERALD GAULE VETERNAS RADIO$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $238k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $41k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $27k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $15k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $30k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $12k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $3k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$529k · 11 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$529k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-2%

Still filing today

55%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $149k · revenue +592%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $98k · revenue +41%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $97k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • VV
    VANCOUVER VETERALS OF FOREIGN WARS
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW WASH
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veterans & Community Housing Coalition

To provide housing opportunities for low income households, to serve the needs of homeless military veterans through case management, advocacy, employment opportunities, temporary and permanent housing to advocate for all military veterans.

Housing & Shelter
2
National Veterans Foundation Inc

To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.

—
3
Veterans Bridge Home Inc

To connect, lead, and advocate in communities to ensure service members, veterans, and their families thrive. see schedule o for additional information.veterans bridge home connects veterans and their families, in any state of transition,…

—
4
Clear Path for Veterans New England Inc

To provide wellness and wellbeing services to veterans and family members across all dimensions and empower them to achieve their full potential. provide outreach services to underserved areas veterans are in.

Public Benefit
5
Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County

Clackamas workforce partnership serves youth, adult, and dislocated workers through its partnerships with private industry and workforce development providers. our job is to develop a highly skilled workforce that creates sustained…

Employment
6
Canines for Service Inc

CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.

Human Services
7
Warrior Built Foundation Inc

Organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans to provide motivation, camaraderie, and to offer a release to cope with similar difficulties in a positive and therapeutic way. Providing safe, fun, and…

Health
8
Dunham House Inc

To provide long term care for combat wounded veterans with spinal cord and/or moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries in order for them to enjoy a high quality of life with exceptional care.

Public Benefit
9
Northland Hospice

We are a team of professionals striving to prepare our patients and families for the end of life experience. we support the patient, family, and friends in facing challenges of a life limiting illness by offering physical, emotional, and…

Human Services
10
Veterans Housing Development Corporation

The specific charitable and public purposes for which the corporation is organized is to support the mission of nation's finest by providing affordable housing - permanent supportive, transitional, rental and ownership - for low income…

Philanthropy
11
Veterans Care Network

Help veterans lift themselves and their families out of poverty

Public Benefit
12
Wny Veterans' Housing Coalition Inc

To acquire and renovate real property in western new york to establish and maintain facilities for the temporary and permanent housing of needy veterans and other special needs individuals.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cdm in-Home Care Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $148,630 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIESCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES: $64,750 · Human ServicesCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICESNW FURNITURE BANK: $25,000 · Human ServicesNW FURNITURE BANKVANCOUVER VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $35,000 · OtherVANCOUVER VETERANS OF FOREIG…FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCMIKE AMODEO FISHERMAN FOR VETERANS: $15,000 · OtherMIKE AMODEO FISHERMAN FOR VE…VANCOUVER VETERALS OF FOREIGN WARS: $15,000 · OtherVANCOUVER VETERALS OF FOREIG…PORTLAND VA FISHER HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherPORTLAND VA FISHER HOUSEGERALD GAULE VETERNAS RADIO: $9,500 · OtherGERALD GAULE VETERNAS RADIOBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW WASH: $7,000 · OtherNW VETERANS IN TECHNOLOGY: $7,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS: $6,000 · OtherA WARRIORS WAY: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $6,300 · OtherOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $97,714 · Community ImprovementOPERATION HOMEFRONT…CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $97,250 · Public BenefitCLARK COUNTY VETER…CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education
Human Services$238,380Other$145,800Community Improvement$97,714Public Benefit$97,250Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $148,630 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $97,714 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER: $97,250 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES: $64,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetA WARRIORS WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds A WARRIORS WAY ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Firstenburg FoundationWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tso Nw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tso Nw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tso Nw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph