Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tso Nw

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$494kHousing & Shelter$70kYouth Development$7kPublic Benefit$7kEducation$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $101k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$208k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES$41,400
CDM SERVICES$30,000
CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CE$30,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$7,000
NW VETERANS IN TECHNOLOGY$7,000
MIKE AMODEO FISHERMAN FOR VETERANS$5,000
GERALD GAULE VETERNAS RADIO$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $238k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $41k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $27k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $15k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $30k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $12k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $5k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 9%CDM SERVICES: $3k → 9%NW FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$529k · 11 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$529k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-2%

Still filing today

55%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $149k · revenue +592%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $98k · revenue +41%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $97k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • VV
    VANCOUVER VETERALS OF FOREIGN WARS
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW WASH
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veterans & Community Housing Coalition

To provide housing opportunities for low income households, to serve the needs of homeless military veterans through case management, advocacy, employment opportunities, temporary and permanent housing to advocate for all military veterans.

Housing & Shelter
2
National Veterans Foundation Inc

To serve the crisis management, information and referral needs of america's veterans and their families.

3
Veterans Bridge Home Inc

To connect, lead, and advocate in communities to ensure service members, veterans, and their families thrive. see schedule o for additional information.veterans bridge home connects veterans and their families, in any state of transition,…

4
Clear Path for Veterans New England Inc

To provide wellness and wellbeing services to veterans and family members across all dimensions and empower them to achieve their full potential. provide outreach services to underserved areas veterans are in.

Public Benefit
5
Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County

Clackamas workforce partnership serves youth, adult, and dislocated workers through its partnerships with private industry and workforce development providers. our job is to develop a highly skilled workforce that creates sustained…

Employment
6
Canines for Service Inc

CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.

Human Services
7
Warrior Built Foundation Inc

Organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans to provide motivation, camaraderie, and to offer a release to cope with similar difficulties in a positive and therapeutic way. Providing safe, fun, and…

Health
8
Dunham House Inc

To provide long term care for combat wounded veterans with spinal cord and/or moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries in order for them to enjoy a high quality of life with exceptional care.

Public Benefit
9
Northland Hospice

We are a team of professionals striving to prepare our patients and families for the end of life experience. we support the patient, family, and friends in facing challenges of a life limiting illness by offering physical, emotional, and…

Human Services
10
Veterans Housing Development Corporation

The specific charitable and public purposes for which the corporation is organized is to support the mission of nation's finest by providing affordable housing - permanent supportive, transitional, rental and ownership - for low income…

Philanthropy
11
Veterans Care Network

Help veterans lift themselves and their families out of poverty

Public Benefit
12
Wny Veterans' Housing Coalition Inc

To acquire and renovate real property in western new york to establish and maintain facilities for the temporary and permanent housing of needy veterans and other special needs individuals.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cdm in-Home Care Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES — $148,630 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIESCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES — $64,750 · Human ServicesCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICESNW FURNITURE BANK — $25,000 · Human ServicesNW FURNITURE BANKVANCOUVER VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS — $35,000 · OtherVANCOUVER VETERANS OF FOREIG…FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCVANCOUVER VETERALS OF FOREIGN WARS — $15,000 · OtherVANCOUVER VETERALS OF FOREIG…MIKE AMODEO FISHERMAN FOR VETERANS — $15,000 · OtherMIKE AMODEO FISHERMAN FOR VE…PORTLAND VA FISHER HOUSE — $10,000 · OtherPORTLAND VA FISHER HOUSEGERALD GAULE VETERNAS RADIO — $9,500 · OtherGERALD GAULE VETERNAS RADIONW VETERANS IN TECHNOLOGY — $7,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW WASH — $7,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS — $6,000 · OtherA WARRIORS WAY — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+3 more — $6,300 · OtherOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $97,714 · Community ImprovementOPERATION HOMEFRONT…CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER — $97,250 · Public BenefitCLARK COUNTY VETER…CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Education
Human Services$238,380Other$145,800Community Improvement$97,714Public Benefit$97,250Education$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES — $148,630 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $97,714 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER — $97,250 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetCDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES — $64,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK — $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetA WARRIORS WAY — $5,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST BATTLE BUDDIES
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY VETERANS ASSISTANCE CENTER
  • Who funds CDM IN-HOME CARE SERVICES
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK
  • Who funds A WARRIORS WAY
  • Who funds CLARK COLLEGE DISTRICT 14 FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Firstenburg FoundationWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tso Nw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph