Skip to content
Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx at a glance

· Private foundation

Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$942kHuman Services$63kYouth Development$29kArts & Culture$27kEnvironment$23kHousing & Shelter$11kEducation$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$9,593
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCORD HOSPITAL$69,425
CONCORD REG VISITING NURSE ASSN$30,963
FUTURE IN SIGHT$9,593
Individual grant recipient$8,070
WAYPOINT$5,000
NH SCOTTISH MUSIC CLUB$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $5k → 7%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $5k → 7%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $4k → 7%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%RISE AGAIN OUTREACH: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+66%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Concord Hospital Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $561k · revenue +52%
  • GV
    Granite VNA Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +20%
  • NH
    New Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight
    6× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • NN
    NAMI NEW HAMPSHIREgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +183%
  • CA
    CONCORD AREA TRUST FOR COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Concord Hospital - Laconia

CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
3
Vna Home Health and Hospice Services Inc

We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.

Health
4
Concord Hospital - Franklin

CH-Franklin is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
5
Central New Hampshire Vna & Hospice

Promoting dignity, independence and well-being through the delivery of quality home health, hospice and community-based care services.

—
6
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
7
Home Health and Hospice Care

Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.

Health
8
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
9
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
10
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
11
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
12
Visiting Nurse Association of Manchester and Southern New Hampshire Inc

We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverbend Community Mental Health; the most unlike its peers is Concord Chorale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
16/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Concord Hospital Inc: $560,707 · HealthConcord Hospital IncGranite VNA Inc: $274,585 · HealthGranite VNA IncConcord Hospital Trust: $35,889 · HealthNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight: $51,054 · OtherNew Hampshire Asso…Individual grant recipient: $25,595 · OtherIndividual grant r…CONCORD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $18,150 · OtherCONCORD BOYS & GIR…KIMBALL JENKINS SCHOOL OF ART INC: $16,000 · OtherKIMBALL JENKINS SC…RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $15,000 · OtherRIVERBEND COMMUNIT…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NH: $10,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG S…SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF: $9,034 · OtherTHRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER: $7,000 · Other+9 more: $24,600 · Other+9 moreRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC: $19,099 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT: $15,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $1,915 · Human ServicesNorthern Forest Center Inc: $11,250 · EducationNew Hampshire Historical Society: $2,500 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$871,181Other$176,433Human Services$36,014Education$11,250Arts & Culture$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConcord Hospital Inc: $560,707 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGranite VNA Inc: $274,585 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight: $51,054 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetConcord Hospital Trust: $35,889 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC: $19,099 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAYPOINT: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthern Forest Center Inc: $11,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER: $7,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNAMI NEW HAMPSHIRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORD CHORALE INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Historical Society: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $1,915 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Concord Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds Granite VNA Inc ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight ↗
  • Who funds Concord Hospital Trust ↗
  • Who funds RISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
  • Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAMI NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORD CHORALE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Gertrude Couch Irrev …Eastern Bank Foundati…Madelaine G Vonweber …Cogswell Benevolent T…Bangor Savings Bank F…Merrimack County Savi…Arthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Concord Female Charit…M L Billings Tr FBO N…Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…Lincoln Financial Fou…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Gertrude Couch Irrev Tuw Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Eastern Bank Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Merrimack County Savings Bank Fdtn · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Concord Female Charitable Society · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home