· Private foundation
Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONCORD HOSPITAL | $69,425 |
| CONCORD REG VISITING NURSE ASSN | $30,963 |
| FUTURE IN SIGHT | $9,593 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,070 |
| WAYPOINT | $5,000 |
| NH SCOTTISH MUSIC CLUB | $800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHConcord Hospital Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $561k · revenue +41%
- GVGranite VNA Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +20%
- NHNew Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight6× · 2017–2025 · $51k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- NNNAMI NEW HAMPSHIREgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +183%
- CACONCORD AREA TRUST FOR COMMUNITYone grant, 2017 · $5k
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMone grant, 2018 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.
CH-Franklin is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
Promoting dignity, independence and well-being through the delivery of quality home health, hospice and community-based care services.
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
We are dedicated to advancing care at home through personal empowerment, compassion, and exceptional service.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverbend Community Mental Health and the most unlike its peers is Concord Chorale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Concord Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds Granite VNA Inc ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Association for the Blind D/B/A Future in Sight ↗
- Who funds Concord Hospital Trust ↗
- Who funds RISE AGAIN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds Northern Forest Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THRIVE SURVIVOR SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds NAMI NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds CONCORD CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Historical Society ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Gertrude Couch Irrev Tuw Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Eastern Bank Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Merrimack County Savings Bank Fdtn · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Concord Female Charitable Society · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trust Uw Benjamin Couch Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.