· Private foundation
Trust under Article Sixth of the Bettina Weary PHD Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of Trust under Article Sixth of the Bettina Weary PHD Charitable Trust’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EXPITEP | $25,000 |
| St Peter's College | $25,000 |
| Young Storytellers | $22,000 |
| Junipero Serra High School | $20,000 |
| Cambridge YMCA | $20,000 |
| Health Occupations Students of America | $10,000 |
| Montessori Seeds of Education | $10,000 |
| St Nicholas Youth Group | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YSYOUNG STORYTELLERS8× · 2017–2024 · $138k · revenue +85%
- ITINTERNATIONAL TRADE EDUCATION PROGRAMS INC DBA EXP6× · 2017–2022 · $136k · revenue +17%
- HOHEALTH OCCUPATIONS STUDENTS OF AMERICA3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- TWTHE WALDORF SCHOOL OF ORANGE COUNTYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +28%
- UUUCI UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT & ALUMNI RELATIONSone grant, 2018 · $10k
- SNST NICHOLAS CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…
The international school of los angeles is a non-profit, independent, international school committed to bilingual education and academic excellence in a nurturing environment.our mission is to develop bilingual critical thinkers who are…
To prepare culturally diverse k-8 grade students to be self-directed learners andresponsible global citizens, by fostering academic excellence and utilizing research-based instructionalapproaches in a multilingual and service learning…
Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
Operation of a boarding school
In lieu of a mission statement, oakwood school has adopted a statement of philosophy. see schedule o for details.in summary, oakwood school's statement of philosophy states that it intends an oakwood education:1. to guide students toward…
Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.
Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…
Los encinos is a small elementary school with a large commitment to provide a comprehensive educational program within a nurturing environment. our impact extends not only to the child, (continue on schedule o) but also to the family. los…
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
Inspire brave learners to shape the future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Trade Education Programs Inc Dba Exp and the most unlike its peers is The Waldorf School of Orange County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNG STORYTELLERS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL TRADE EDUCATION PROGRAMS INC DBA EXP ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds HEALTH OCCUPATIONS STUDENTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds MONTESSORI SEEDS OF EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WALDORF SCHOOL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LARCHMONT SCHOOLS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trust under Article Sixth of the Bettina Weary PHD Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.