Skip to content
Trust Point Foundation Inc Xxxxxx2342 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Trust Point Foundation Inc Xxxxxx2342

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$324k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$631kYouth Development$275kHuman Services$168kPhilanthropy$59kArts & Culture$56kCrime & Legal$28kEnvironment$20kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $154k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys and Girls Club of Greater$101,500
VITERBO UNIVERSITY$52,500
UW-La Crosse Alumni & Friends Foundation$32,500
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER$14,500
Eau Claire Public Schools Foundation$14,069
Women's Fund of Greater La Crosse$12,200
UPLIFT NORTH$10,000
KIPP Minnesota$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Assistance League of Minneapolis$10,000
University of WI - La Crosse$7,728
LA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION$5,000
Saint Paul Public Schools$3,000
FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN$1,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $15k → 12%UPLIFT NORTH: $10k → 11%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $27k → 12%Catholic Charities: $20k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $6k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $6k → 12%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1k → 12%APTIV FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 12%Karuna Inc: $500 → 12%Karuna Inc: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 32 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
17

Total granted

$1.1M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+31%

Still filing today

53%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VITERBO UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $321k · revenue +11%
  • FA
    FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $109k · revenue +24%
  • NA
    NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -50%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
2
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
5
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
6
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
8
Minnesota Chamber Foundation

The organization's mission is to bring stakeholders together to promote prosperity and long-term growth of minnesota's economy.

Public Benefit
9
Lake Superior Community Health Center

To improve access to quality health care for all.

Health
10
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
11
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
12
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Crosse Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club of Greater: $237,700 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of GreaterLA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION: $115,066 · OtherLA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATIONUniversity of WI - La Crosse: $42,728 · OtherUniversity of WI - La CrosseBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GATEWAY AREA: $35,000 · OtherUW-La Crosse Alumni & Friends Foundation: $35,000 · OtherSAINT PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $23,978 · OtherLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $23,820 · Other+33 more: $150,500 · Other+33 moreVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $320,500 · EducationVITERBO UNIVERSITYEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $41,976 · EducationEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDA…+3 more: $15,330 · EducationFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $109,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY AND C…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…UPLIFT NORTH: $10,000 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTH+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $23,500 · PhilanthropyWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER LA CROSSE INC: $17,650 · PhilanthropyGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $16,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $4,700 · Arts & CultureNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $27,500 · Crime & LegalCOULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,750 · AnimalsWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $5,500 · Animals
Other$663,792Education$377,806Human Services$141,000Philanthropy$58,650Arts & Culture$34,700Crime & Legal$27,500Animals$17,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $320,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $109,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $41,976 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $27,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $23,820 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $23,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER LA CROSSE INC: $17,650 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $16,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $11,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUPLIFT NORTH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNAMI MINNESOTA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKIPP Minnesota: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA CROSSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $9,200 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC: $4,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA CROSSE PROMISE INC: $4,330 over 5y, 0.6% of budget360 Communities: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKARUNAINC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPTIV FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGuild: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTVIEW ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA STATE COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY WORKS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
  • Who funds La Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER LA CROSSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT NORTH ↗
  • Who funds NAMI MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds KIPP Minnesota ↗
  • Who funds LA CROSSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PBS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds LA CROSSE PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds 360 Communities ↗
  • Who funds Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Crosse Community F…Xcel Energy FoundationMayo Clinic Group Ret…Smith Russell & Vera …Sue Anne Gelatt Found…Lyche Family Foundati…Otto Bremer TrustCleary-Kumm Foundatio…Locher Family Foundat…The Jamf Nation Globa…Dahl Family Foundatio…John & Kathy Reinhart…
La Crosse Community FoundationWI34.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Crosse Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Smith Russell & Vera Private Fdn Xxxxxx4172 · Sue Anne Gelatt Foundation · Lyche Family Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Locher Family Foundation Trust Xxxxxx1227 · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214 · John & Kathy Reinhart Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trust Point Foundation Inc Xxxxxx2342 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust Point Foundation Inc Xxxxxx2342. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trust Point Foundation Inc Xxxxxx2342’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home