· Public charity
Trucking Cares Foundation
To improve the safety of the trucking industry and the safety, security, and sustainability of america's highways and communities we serve by supporting and promoting research, education, leadership development, and volunteerism and a broad range of charitable activities towards those ends.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $185,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $200,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $135k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| NEXT GENERATION IN TRUCKING FOUNDATION CORPORATION | $40,000 |
| TRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING | $25,000 |
| SOUTH DALLAS DRIVING ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| VOICES FOR AWARENESS FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| ST CHRISTOPHER TRUCKERS DEVELOPMENT & RELIEF FUND | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING5× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +260%
- CACongressional Award Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +79%
- VFVOICES FOR AWARENESS FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- VSVARIOUS STATE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATIONSone grant, 2019 · $30k
- CFCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAININGgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +28%
Save The Children Federation Incone grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota trucking association's mission is to advance a safe and succesful minnesota trucking industry through advocacy, education and focused initiatives.
To improve the safety of the trucking industry and the safety, security, and sustainability of america's highways and communities we serve by supporting and promoting research, education, leadership development, and volunteerism and a…
Operates exclusively for charitable, educational, research, environmental, and/or scientific purposes. promotes and advances highway safety and a safe trucking industry through research, educational activities, media programs about safety,…
To develop, fund and administer programs that advance the trucking industry's commitment to highway safety, workforce development, public image, scholarships & charitable causes.
Promoting the interests, image, and safety of florida's trucking community
At California Transportation Foundation (CTF) our mission is simple. We recognize the best and brightest in our industry with our Annual CTF Transportation Awards program. We remember those who have given all in service to the people of…
The american traffic safety services foundation ("the foundation") exists to promote roadway safety through charitable giving and public awareness programs.
To promote the trucking industry in west virginia
Non-profit organization working to support other organizations that work to overcome cancer.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Trucking Association Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Voices for Awareness Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING ↗
- Who funds Congressional Award Foundation ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR AWARENESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds South Dallas Driving Academy ↗
- Who funds Next Generation In Trucking Foundation Corporation ↗
- Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER TRUCKERS DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds HIS BRIDGEBUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE TRUCKING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TMTA Foundation ↗
- Who funds Associated Industries of Arkansas Foundation ↗
- Who funds IOWA MOTOR CARRIERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trucking Cares Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Truckers Against Trafficking — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.