Skip to content
Triplecord Family Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Triplecord Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$120kEducation$13kHuman Services$7kArts & Culture$6kPhilanthropy$6kHousing & Shelter$5kAnimals$3kFood & Nutrition$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BILLY GRAHAM LIBRARY$1,000
YOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WEARS VALLEY RANCH: $2k → 12%HANDS OF LOVE USA: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
CO
VA
AR
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
30

Total granted

$118k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CLEBE MCCLARY EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $37k · revenue +116%
  • KI
    KARDO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $16k · revenue +103%
  • BM
    BLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • BG
    BROOKGREEN GARDENSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +52%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • MH
    MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Banner Christian School Inc

To operate a christian school serving grades k-12

Education
5
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
6
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
7
Carolina Christian Academy

Educational instruciton for students in prek-12th grades.

—
8
Blackwelder Ministries Inc

To proclaim the truth of god's word.

Religion
9
Believer's International Inc

Christian publishing company

—
10
Dean Bible Ministries Inc

Spread the gospel of jesus christ through sound teachings of the bible.

Religion
11
Remnant Ministries International Inc

Remnant ministries international is an evangelistic and apostolic ministry dedicated to proclaiming the gospel of jesus christ. the organization engages in revivals, crusades, youth camps, mission trips, and leadership development…

Religion
12
Bible Open Air Mission

Purpose is sending individuals around the world to win souls to jesus christ by preaching the gospel evangelism.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Miracle Hill Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kardo International Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEBE MCCLARY EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $37,120 · OtherCLEBE MCCLARY EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONFAMILY LIFE - A CRU MINISTRY: $35,000 · OtherFAMILY LIFE - A CRU MINISTRYIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherKARDO MINISTRIES: $5,000 · Other+22 more: $21,367 · Other+22 moreKARDO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $16,000 · EducationKARDO INTERNATI…PROVIDENCE CLASSICAL SCHOOL: $3,833 · EducationPROVIDENCE CLAS…THE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $1,200 · EducationTHE CITADEL FOU…CALDWELL ACADEMY: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationBLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 · ReligionBLACKABY MIN…ANGEL MINISTRIES: $6,200 · ReligionANGEL MINIST…Likewise Worship Inc: $3,500 · ReligionLikewise Wor…JORDAN MINISTRIES: $2,000 · ReligionJORDAN MINIS…+3 more: $400 · ReligionMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWEARS VALLEY RANCH INC: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $6,000 · EnvironmentPATRIOTS AT THE BEACH INC: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$103,987Education$22,233Religion$18,600Human Services$6,600Environment$6,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEBE MCCLARY EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $37,120 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetKARDO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $16,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetBLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetANGEL MINISTRIES: $6,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOTS AT THE BEACH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetPROVIDENCE CLASSICAL SCHOOL: $3,833 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLikewise Worship Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJORDAN MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWEARS VALLEY RANCH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALDWELL ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMoms in Prayer Int'l: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEBE MCCLARY EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KARDO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BLACKABY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BROOKGREEN GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOTS AT THE BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CLASSICAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Likewise Worship Inc ↗
  • Who funds JORDAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WEARS VALLEY RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALDWELL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM NATIVITY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Nathan Smith Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…Tulsa Community Found…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…Raymond James Charita…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…
Christian Community Foundation IncCO17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Triplecord Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Triplecord Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Triplecord Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home