Skip to content
Triple H Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Triple H Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$294kHuman Services$200kInternational$199kYouth Development$133kEducation$70kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PA FAMILY INSTITUTE$10,000
THE BRIDGE YOUTH CENTER$10,000
ZOE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
CROSSROADS MINISTRIES$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE INTERNATIONAL REL$10,000
ALIGN LIFE MINISTRIES$10,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
GLOBAL DISCIPLES$10,000
ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES$7,500
TNT YOUTH MINISTRY$5,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$5,000
THE MINISTRY CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,750
THE FACTORY MINISTRIES$3,000
HOPE RESCUE MISSION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%PA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%PA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%PA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%PA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $25k → 9%ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $20k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $15k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $13k → 9%ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $10k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $10k → 9%ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $10k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $10k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $10k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $9k → 9%ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $8k → 9%ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$917k · 25 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +117% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$917k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+19%

Still filing today

64%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTH STAR INITIATIVE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $91k · revenue +202%
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +140%
  • GD
    GLOBAL DISCIPLES
    6× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • TF
    THE FIRST RESPONSE TEAM OF AMERICA CORP
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
2
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
3
Israel Restoration Ministries
Religion
4
Puzzle Piece Ministries

To deliver the message of Jesus

Religion
5
Jesus Ministries International

Promote christian religion through conferences and group meetings.

Religion
6
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
7
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
8
Hope Outreach International Ministries

Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…

Religion
9
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
10
Shalom Ministries Inc

We are a gospel mission seeking to reach out to jewish and gentile people with the good news that jesus christ is the messiah of israel and the savior of the world, while edifying people about the jewish roots of christianity.

Religion
11
Transform Ministries
—
12
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zoe International; the most unlike its peers is Piercing Word Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINKLETOWN MENNONITE SCHOOL: $67,300 · OtherHINKLETOWN MENNONITE SCHOOLALIGN LIFE MINISTRIES: $50,000 · OtherALIGN LIFE MINISTRIESFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $40,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYIndividual grant recipient: $37,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUTH WITH A MISSION: $30,000 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSIONMINISTRY CENTER: $30,000 · OtherMINISTRY CENTERDOVE WESTGATE CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherDOVE WESTGATE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherLIFEWAY CHURCH INC: $15,000 · Other+16 more: $75,475 · Other+16 moreNORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $91,400 · Human ServicesNORTH STAR INITIATIVEPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $60,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INS…SHALOM PLACE T/A ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $55,000 · Human ServicesSHALOM PLACE T/A ABUNDA…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesZOE INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 · ReligionZOE INTERNATIONALMEN OF IRON: $51,000 · ReligionMEN OF IRONCROSSROADS MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 · ReligionCROSSROADS MINISTRIES …HORIZON INITIATIVE: $35,000 · ReligionHORIZON INITIATIVESAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 · InternationalHOPE INTE…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalGLOBAL DISCIPLES: $70,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BRIDGE YOUTH CENTER INC: $35,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FACTORY MINISTRIES: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentTNT YOUTH MINISTRY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FIRST RESPONSE TEAM OF AMERICA CORP: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$381,525Human Services$207,400Religion$199,000International$81,000Arts & Culture$70,000Youth Development$49,500Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $91,400 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL DISCIPLES: $70,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSHALOM PLACE T/A ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES: $55,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEN OF IRON: $51,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetALIGN LIFE MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCROSSROADS MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetTHE BRIDGE YOUTH CENTER INC: $35,500 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetHORIZON INITIATIVE: $35,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FACTORY MINISTRIES: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE RESCUE MISSION OF THE CITY OF READING: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIRST RESPONSE TEAM OF AMERICA CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTNT YOUTH MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPiercing Word Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLITITZ AREA MENNONITE SCHOOL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY MINISTRIES PREGNANCY CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJUSTICE & MERCY INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLEAST OF THESE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH STAR INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL DISCIPLES ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SHALOM PLACE T/A ABUNDANT LIVING MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ZOE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF IRON ↗
  • Who funds ALIGN LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE FACTORY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE RESCUE MISSION OF THE CITY OF READING ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST RESPONSE TEAM OF AMERICA CORP ↗
  • Who funds TNT YOUTH MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Piercing Word Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITITZ AREA MENNONITE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MINISTRIES PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE & MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAST OF THESE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LEAST OF THESE MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Comm…Christian Community F…Burkholder Family Fou…Clark Associates Char…Shady Maple FoundationAnabaptist FoundationNorth Foundation IncNatl Christian Charit…The Norman & Elizabet…Wenger Foundation IncEden Bridge FoundationServant Foundation
Lancaster County Community FoundationPA33.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Burkholder Family Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Shady Maple Foundation · Anabaptist Foundation · North Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Norman & Elizabeth Hahn Family Foundation · Wenger Foundation Inc · Eden Bridge Foundation · Servant Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Triple H Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Triple H Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Triple H Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Triple H Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Triple H’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home