Skip to content
Triple E Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Triple E Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$222k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$248kInternational$84kAnimals$55kEnvironment$38kCommunity Improvement$36kFood & Nutrition$31kHealth$23kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $106k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACE UNIVERSITY$106,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$10,000
RAZOM FOR UKRAINE$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$5,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
NYC BIRD ALLIANCE$5,000
VOSTOK SOS USA$5,000
ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD (APCC)$5,000
MAMARONECK PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$5,000
WILD CARE INC$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION$5,000
1925 FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EMMA'S TORCH: $5k → 20%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $1k → 9%Keeps Inc: $250 → 9%FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE: $2k → 9%FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE: $1k → 9%FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE: $1k → 9%FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE: $500 → 9%FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AR
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$749k · 41 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
23

Total granted

$749k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+13%

Still filing today

61%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PACE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +24%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +98%
  • RAZOM INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • CI
    COMP-U-DOPT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +286%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
10
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
11
Akashinga Inc

Deliver ecological stability and long-term protection of large-scale wilderness by supporting and empowering local communities.

Animals
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
29/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACE UNIVERSITY: $274,500 · EducationPACE UNIVERSITYWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $30,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC+5 more: $25,000 · Education+5 moreMAMARONECK PUBLIC LIBRARY: $40,000 · OtherMAMARONECK PUBLIC LIBRARYCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $35,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERNEW YORK PET RESCUE: $34,000 · OtherNEW YORK PET RESCUEHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $20,250 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $14,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherMAMARONECK OBSERVER INC: $11,000 · OtherAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 · OtherNYC BIRD ALLIANCE: $10,000 · Other1925 FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherVOSTOK SOS USA INC: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $10,000 · Other+23 more: $41,950 · Other+23 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $53,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …RAZOM INC: $20,000 · InternationalRAZOM INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 · InternationalInternational …DIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLE: $5,000 · InternationalOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · EnvironmentASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentWestchester Land Trust Inc: $6,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · Environment+2 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentWILD CAREINC: $10,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Conservancy: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $2,000 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $2,000 · Animals+1 more: $750 · AnimalsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,250 · Civil RightsVOTERIDERS: $6,000 · Civil RightsFURNITURE SHAREHOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesEMMA'S TORCH LTD: $5,000 · Human ServicesAT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human Services
Education$329,500Other$283,700International$103,000Environment$34,000Animals$24,750Civil Rights$16,250Human Services$15,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACE UNIVERSITY: $274,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $53,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $20,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILD CAREINC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVOTERIDERS: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFURNITURE SHAREHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND: $5,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMMA'S TORCH LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAT HOME ON THE SOUND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFARESTART: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNTY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDOVO FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUSHLIFE CONSERVANCY: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOST DOG RESCUE FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE CAPE COD INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD CAREINC ↗
  • Who funds COMP-U-DOPT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds VOTERIDERS ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
  • Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
  • Who funds The National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AT HOME ON THE SOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Lance R Wachenhei…The Thomas and Agnes …Boston Foundation IncThe New York Communit…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…
Jewish Communal FundNY15.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Lance R Wachenheim Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Triple E Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Triple E Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Association to Preserve Cape Cod Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • American Littoral Society: 1% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Triple E Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Triple E Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Triple E’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home