Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Trifam Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$122k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$140kFood & Nutrition$22kEducation$9kEnvironment$8kArts & Culture$4kYouth Development$4kReligion$4kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $122k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC$122,400
UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY$2,000
PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK$2,000
CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK$2,000
OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $500 → 15%EMPIRE RANCH FOUNDATION: $500 → 19%MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $122k → 16%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - KITSAP COUNTY: $1k → 9%GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES AAU: $500 → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $500 → 15%EMPIRE RANCH FOUNDATION: $500 → 19%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - KITSAP COUNTY: $1k → 9%GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $500 → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - KITSAP COUNTY: $1k → 9%GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY: $2k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY: $2k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - KITSAP COUNTY: $1k → 9%GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $2k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY: $2k → 12%UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $2k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY: $2k → 12%OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY: $2k → 12%UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $2k → 10%UNITED WAY OF CLALLAM COUNTY: $2k → 12%CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY: $2k → 10%CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK: $2k → 10%ST MICHAELS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ST MICHAELS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ST MICHAELS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ST MICHAELS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$73k · 16 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$73k
$1k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionPhilanthropyEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    Central Kitsap Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • OC
    OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +29%
  • GP
    GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • PA
    PORT ANGELES YOUTH BASKETBALL
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kitsap Community Foundation

: a catalyst for the greater good. we partner with donors and others to invest in our region's nonprofit organizations to foster a more vibrant kitsap peninsula for the benefit of all.

Philanthropy
2
Sequim Food Bank

To provide food and assistance to individuals and organizations within our community so that "no one goes hungry in Sequim".Our 5 core values that guide our work:1. Compassion and Respect: Turn no one away from services and always…

3
The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound

To grow a lasting culture of generosity and well-being in the South Puget Sound through connection, leadership, and investment.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of Skagit County

United Way of Skagit County's mission is to build a positive and sustainable quality of life for all.

Philanthropy
5
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
6
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
7
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
8
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
9
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
10
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
11
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
12
Pacific Northwest Economic Region Foundation

To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Clallam County and the most unlike its peers is Empire Ranch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $122,400 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC+9 more — $13,750 · Other+9 moreUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF K…OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $9,000 · PhilanthropyOLYMPIC COLLEGE…United Way of Clallam County — $8,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of C…PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK — $10,000 · Food & NutritionPORT ANGELES…Central Kitsap Food Bank — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Kits…Community Food Bank Inc — $2,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Fo…GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY — $8,000 · EnvironmentEmpire Ranch Foundation — $2,000 · EnvironmentKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $800 · Animals
Other$136,150Philanthropy$27,000Food & Nutrition$22,000Environment$10,000Animals$800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPORT ANGELES FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $10,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Kitsap Food Bank — $10,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Clallam County — $8,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmpire Ranch Foundation — $2,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY
  • Who funds Central Kitsap Food Bank
  • Who funds OLYMPIC COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds United Way of Clallam County
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds Empire Ranch Foundation
  • Who funds KITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kitsap Community FoundationWA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kitsap Community Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trifam Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph