Skip to content
Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc

Activities of tcwib include only those specifically designated under the workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa).

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$24MYouth Development$346kCommunity Improvement$277kScience & Tech$119kEducation$116kHealth$92kEnvironment$28kAnimals$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $2,866,883, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,960,612 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $93,729 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
$15,082
Median grant
2
States reached
$902k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAREER TRACK INC$2,164,208
STEAMFITTERS TECHNOLOGY CENTER LOCAL 449$385,565
Q&A TRAINING & CONSULTING INC$80,111
BUTLER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$42,576
ECONOMIC MODELING LLC$30,000
WESTMORLAND - FAYETTE WIB$27,713
QUALITY LIFE SERVICES$23,600
BUTLER COUNTY AREA VO-TECH$19,951
BELLEVILLE INTERNATIONAL$15,082
ARMSTRONG CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LEARNING$12,423
BLACK LABEL LAWN CARE$11,790
INDIANA COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT$10,866
RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,390
INDIANA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,069
ARMSTRONG CO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$7,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CONCORDIA LUTHERAN HEALTH & HUMAN CARE: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 23 repeat orgs$501k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
27

Total granted

$25M
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+23%

Still filing today

17%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentHealthEducationScience & TechHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CAREER TRACK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20M · revenue +0% · 100% of their budget
  • WC
    WEST CENTRAL JOB PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $135k · revenue +17%
  • AC
    Armstrong Center for Community Learning
    3× · 2021–2025 · $31k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • WG
    WASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI
    one grant, 2021 · $133k · revenue +10%
  • NH
    NEW HORIZONS CLC OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2017 · $39k
  • CF
    CENTER FPR INDIVIDUAL ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
2
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
3
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
4
Central Penn Business Group On Health

Central business group on health advocates for the appropriate balance between cost and quality of employee healthcare in lancaster county by providing education on healthcare issues, promoting cooperation among payers, providers and…

—
5
Allied Services Skilled Nursing Center

We are committed to the people of our community, to help them overcome challenges and reach their greatest potential by providing quality care, people oriented services, and comfort through the operation of a skilled and intermediate…

Health
6
Center for Community Resources Inc

To coordinate services among private and government agencies for specialized populations to ensure service continuity, reduce duplication, and assist individuals and families in accessing appropriate mental health, intellectual…

Health
7
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
9
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
10
Central Pennsylvania National Guard & Veterans Association
Public Benefit
11
Johnstown Area Regional Industries

Create & maintain jobs

Community Improvement
12
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Skilled Nursing Inc; the most unlike its peers is South Butler Cty School District Fd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAREER TRACK INC: $19,848,414 · EmploymentCAREER TRACK INCSTEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 449 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING COMMITTEE: $2,538,284 · EmploymentSTEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 449 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING COMMITTEE+3 more: $295,805 · EmploymentBUTLER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $696,738 · OtherBUTLER COUN…INDIANA COUNTY TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $437,815 · OtherINDIANA COU…QUALITY LIFE SERVICES: $229,282 · OtherQUALITY LIF…LENAPE TECH ADULT EDUCATION: $157,665 · OtherLENAPE TECH…OBERG INDUSTRIES: $119,822 · OtherQ&A TRAINING & CONSULTING INC: $116,969 · Other+36 more: $884,760 · Other+36 moreINDIANA SKILLED NURSING INC: $17,368 · HealthCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER: $8,642 · HealthCONCORDIA VISITING NURSES: $7,653 · HealthArmstrong County Memorial Hospital: $7,600 · HealthINDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $6,400 · HealthSOUTH BUTLER CTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FD: $5,991 · EducationREGIONAL LEARNING ALLIANCE RLA: $5,429 · EducationIUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $7,889 · Science & TechCONCORDIA LUTHERAN HEALTH AND HUMAN CARE: $5,802 · Human Services
Employment$22,682,503Other$2,643,051Health$47,663Education$11,420Science & Tech$7,889Human Services$5,802

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAREER TRACK INC: $19,848,414 over 9y, 100% of budgetSTEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 449 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING COMMITTEE: $2,538,284 over 4y, 21% of budgetWEST CENTRAL JOB PARTNERSHIP INC: $135,214 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI: $132,878 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetArmstrong Center for Community Learning: $31,370 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWestmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board: $27,713 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIANA SKILLED NURSING INC: $17,368 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER: $8,642 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $7,889 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORDIA VISITING NURSES: $7,653 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArmstrong County Memorial Hospital: $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA LUTHERAN HEALTH AND HUMAN CARE: $5,802 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL LEARNING ALLIANCE RLA: $5,429 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAREER TRACK INC ↗
  • Who funds STEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 449 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL JOB PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON GREENE COUNTY JOB TRAINI ↗
  • Who funds Armstrong Center for Community Learning ↗
  • Who funds Westmoreland-Fayette Workforce Investment Board ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA SKILLED NURSING INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds IUP RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA VISITING NURSES ↗
  • Who funds Armstrong County Memorial Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tri-County Workforce Investment Board’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home