Skip to content

· Private foundation

Trehan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$155k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$217kHuman Services$115kInternational$22kReligion$10kCommunity Improvement$7kEducation$5kYouth Development$4kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$1,499
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIA HOUSE$109,500
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$35,000
SMILE TRAIN$1,499
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF FAISALABAD$1,499
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,499
FRIENDS OF PARIVAR INC$1,499
EC4A$1,499
UNICEF$1,499
AKANKSHA$1,023
BAPS SHRI SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR$51
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HINDU CHARITIES OF AMERICA: $3k → 6%FORT BEND WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 8%INDIA HOUSE: $110k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of Trehan Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Trehan Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$93k · 10 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +101% since the first grant, against -39% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
28

Total granted

$93k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
-39%

Still filing today

60%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $6k · revenue +72%
  • DI
    Daya Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $6k · revenue +280%
  • SI
    Sewa International Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • FB
    FORT BEND PARTNERSHIP FOR YOUTH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
India House Foundation

India House Foundation is dedicated to the protection of democracy and human rights in India, from the perspective of Indian-Americans based in the USA.

Civil Rights
2
Sister India Ltd

Sister India provides a holistic program, protecting and uplifting women and girls, ending trafficking, child marriages and child labor, lifting families from poverty, and ensuring girls can go to school instead. We research effective…

International
3
Indo American Development and Health Organization
International
4
Shadhika Project

Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…

—
5
International Association for Child Aid

Contribute vitamins and essential nutrients to the poor and unnourished children plus nourish the poor pregnant mothers in South Asia. In addition has constructed 65 wells for supplying water to tribal people in India,serving 8540 families.

Human Services
6
Us Giving to Maher

US Giving to Maher provides resources to charities in India that align with our goal of an India where all people have the opportunity for a decent life, dignity, and happiness regardless of caste, gender or religion.

International
7
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
8
Sindhi Association of North America
—
9
Indians for Collective Action

ICA's mission is to support sustainable development in India by partnering with dedicated non-government organizations (NGO's) and individuals.

Civil Rights
10
India Partners

International relief, development and education.

International
11
Asset India Foundation

Facilitating international charitable donations to support urgent and high-impact needs in India, including healthcare, education, livelihoods, and social welfare, by enabling U.S. donors to give to vetted causes through Milaap.org.

International
12
Sanitation and Health Rights in India

SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cry-Child Rights and You America Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Hope Endowment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $128,045 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+2 more: $2,499 · PhilanthropyINDIA HOUSE INC: $109,500 · Human ServicesINDIA HOUSE INCSewa International Inc: $4,500 · Human Services+2 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesDONOR ADVISORY FUNDS: $64,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISORY FUNDSIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+26 more: $31,443 · Other+26 moreCRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC: $6,250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,499 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,199 · InternationalWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $2,000 · InternationalThe Hope Endowment: $1,250 · InternationalDaya Inc: $6,250 · Community ImprovementSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION FOR INDIA STUDIES: $1,000 · Arts & CultureINDO-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $900 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · Health
Philanthropy$130,544Human Services$117,500Other$115,443International$16,198Community Improvement$6,250Housing & Shelter$2,000Arts & Culture$1,900Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $128,045 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIA HOUSE INC: $109,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetCRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC: $6,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDaya Inc: $6,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSewa International Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,499 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,199 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU CHARITIES FOR AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC: $1,499 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,499 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hope Endowment: $1,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIA STUDIES: $1,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDO-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Daya Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds HINDU CHARITIES FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Women for Afghan Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hope Endowment ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIA STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds SUNSAR MAYA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDO-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX18.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trehan Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trehan Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Trehan Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Trehan Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trehan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph