Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tr Uw Mary J Proctor Xxxxx4008

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$166kAnimals$38kYouth Development$28kArts & Culture$9kPublic Benefit$5kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$500k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANAPOLIS CHILDRENS CHOIR$9,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL INDIANA$9,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF$5,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF$5,000
INDIANA CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF YOUTH$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $33k → 16%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $18k → 16%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $15k → 16%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $14k → 16%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $13k → 16%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $11k → 16%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER INC: $8k → 16%INDIANA DIAPER BANK: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$201k · 4 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$201k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+268%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +63%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF
    7× · 2018–2025 · $43k
  • SI
    STARFISH INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $38k

Funded once

  • ID
    INDIANA DIAPER BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +268%
  • PC
    PROVIDENCE CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • DA
    DREAM ALIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Co Child Day Care Program

Teaming with families to provide high quality child care and education services for all children.

Human Services
2
Indiana Association of School Principals

To lead in the advocacy and support of all principals in their commitment to every child.

Education
3
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
4
Kipp Indianapolis Inc

KIPP Indianapolis, Inc. (KIPP Indy) is a network of tuition-free, open-enrollment, college preparatory, public charter schools.

Education
5
The Arc of Indiana County

Our mission is to work to include all children and adults with developmental delays or other disabilities in every community by identifying barriers, building partnerships, and realizing solutions.

Education
6
Elevate Indianapolis Inc

Our mission is to build long-term, life-changing relationships with Indianapolis urban youth, equipping them to thrive and contribute to their community

Education
7
Indiana Family to Family

Through the power of shared experience, indiana family to family provides peer-to-peer support, training and information to families raising children and youth with diverse health and mental health needs and the professionals who serve…

—
8
Southwest Indiana Child Advocacy Center Coalition

To advocate for the rights and interests of children in Southwestern Indiana.

Youth Development
9
Indiana Council On Educating Students of Color

To collaborate with parents and students to creatively design educational opportunities that lead to enhanced students.

Education
10
Communities in Schools Indiana

Surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Youth Development
11
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families Inc. is dedicated to safeguarding the well-being of children and families. Through our comprehensive programs and services, we actively work to prevent child abuse and neglect, offering support and resources to families in…

Human Services
12
Indiana Association of Resources and

To promote cooperation, communication, development and mutual support among organizations providing services to children and their families and to advocate for the establishment and maintenance of the highest quality services possible to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth; the most unlike its peers is Exploradoor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $110,341 · Human ServicesST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INCINDIANA DIAPER BANK INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF: $43,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OFSTARFISH INC: $38,000 · OtherSTARFISH INCPROVIDENCE CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $5,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF: $5,000 · OtherMARION COUNTY COMMISSION: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherEXPLORADOOR INC: $10,000 · EducationIndianapolis Children's Choir: $9,000 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $9,000 · InternationalDREAM ALIVE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentINDIANA CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF YOUTH ABUSE AND SUICIDE: $4,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$115,341Other$99,000Education$10,000Arts & Culture$9,000International$9,000Youth Development$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $110,341 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetEXPLORADOOR INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetIndianapolis Children's Choir: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA DIAPER BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDREAM ALIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIANA CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF YOUTH ABUSE AND SUICIDE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPLORADOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Indianapolis Children's Choir ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA DIAPER BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF YOUTH ABUSE AND SUICIDE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial FoundationIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Ackerman Foundation · Hoover Family Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Lilly Endowment Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Uw Mary J Proctor Xxxxx4008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Uw Mary J Proctor Xxxxx4008. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tr Uw Mary J Proctor Xxxxx4008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph