Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tr Ua Earl C Hull Charitable 12-238800

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$280kHuman Services$76kArts & Culture$61kEnvironment$36kAnimals$27kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$18kReligion$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $78k
$5,097
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AAONMS$17,008
Individual grant recipient$17,008
HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$11,894
ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$11,894
MT STMARY'S HOSP OF NIAGARA FALLS$10,195
NIAGARA FALLS MEM MEDICAL$10,195
THE SALVATION ARMY$7,664
NIAGARA COUNTY SPCA$7,663
GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND$6,797
CAMP GOOD DAYS & SPECIAL TIMES INC$6,797
COUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA CNTY INC$5,097
ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED MD CENTER$5,097
NIAGARA HOSPICE$5,097
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$5,097
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,097
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA CNTY INC: $7k → 14%HEALTH ASSOC OF NIAGARA COUNTY: $7k → 14%COUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA CNTY INC: $5k → 14%HEALTH ASSOC OF NIAGARA: $5k → 14%HEALTH ASSOC OF NIAGARA: $3k → 14%HEALTH ASSOC OF NIAGARA COUNTY: $3k → 14%COUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA CNTY INC: $3k → 14%NIAGARA HOSPICE: $7k → 14%NIAGARA HOSPICE: $5k → 14%NIAGARA HOSPICE: $3k → 14%NIAGARA HOSPICE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$560k · 24 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$560k
$17k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +59%
  • GD
    GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +20%
  • NH
    NIAGARA HOSPICE INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • RP
    ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FDN-COMBINED
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • CG
    CAMP GOOD DAYS & SPECIAL
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF NYS
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Herpes Cure Advocacy

Informed advocacy relating to the cure, treatment and prevention for herpes simplex virus types 1 + 2 infections.

Health
3
The Glaucoma Foundation Inc

The glaucoma foundation, inc. is an international not-for-profit organization dedicated to eradicating glaucoma, the leading cause of preventable blindness. the strategy to achieve this goal is two-fold: raise public awareness concerning…

Health
4
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
7
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
8
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Association of Niagara County Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AAONMS: $60,712 · OtherAAONMSIndividual grant recipient: $60,712 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMT STMARY'S HOSP OF NIAGARA FALLS: $36,392 · OtherMT STMARY'S HOSP OF NIAGARA FALLSGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $24,261 · OtherGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INCNIAGARA FALLS MEM MEDICAL CTR: $20,268 · OtherST MARY'S SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $18,195 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $18,195 · OtherWESTERN NY LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $18,195 · OtherELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED MD CENTER: $18,195 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NIAGARA INC: $18,195 · OtherNIAGARA FALLS MEM MEDICAL: $16,124 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $15,367 · OtherAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC: $15,230 · Other+7 more: $40,920 · Other+7 moreHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $42,457 · HealthHEARING HEALTH …American Heart Association Inc: $18,195 · HealthAmerican Heart …MARCH OF DIMES INC: $18,195 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES …NIAGARA HOSPICE INC: $18,195 · Human ServicesNIAGARA H…HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC: $18,195 · Human ServicesHEALTH AS…COUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC: $15,230 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL O…ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $35,539 · PhilanthropyNIAGARA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $27,354 · AnimalsCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $20,308 · Recreation & Sports
Other$380,961Health$78,847Human Services$51,620Philanthropy$35,539Animals$27,354Recreation & Sports$20,308

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION: $42,457 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $35,539 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNIAGARA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $27,354 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $24,261 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $20,308 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNIAGARA HOSPICE INC: $18,195 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF: $18,195 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $18,195 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $18,195 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $18,195 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC: $18,195 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC: $15,230 over 3y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF NIAGARA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Ua Earl C Hull Charitable 12-238800 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Ua Earl C Hull Charitable 12-238800. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tr Ua Earl C Hull Charitable 12-238800’s filings →

    More from the funding graph