· Private foundation
Abreu M & F Ctr Tr Ua
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $368k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ATLANTA | $70,000 |
| SWIFT SCHOOL | $30,000 |
| ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION INC | $28,500 |
| ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $26,500 |
| LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT | $25,000 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| HISTORIC OAKLAND FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| THE SKILLPOINTE FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| THE FURNITURE BANK OF METRO ATLANTA | $15,000 |
| MERIDIAN EDUCATION RESOURCE GROUP DBA | $15,000 |
| WOODLANDS GARDEN OF DECATUR INC | $15,000 |
| BEARINGS BIKE WORKS | $15,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FIFernbank Inc3× · 2019–2024 · $161k · revenue +71%
- LALIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC6× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +89%
- CNCHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER INC4× · 2019–2025 · $128k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- WWWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +163%
- SPSAFE PLACE INCone grant, 2021 · $35k
- WFWESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Horizons Atlanta is a tuition-free, intensive, six-week summer academic and enrichment program that supports students from under-served communities over the course of their academic careers.
To empower financially vulnerable individuals in our community to become self-sufficient, sustainably employed, and economic contributors to society.
Provides mediation services and mediation training for all manner of disputes, private and public, without the need for formal audication through the court system.
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…
Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.
It is the mission of leadership atlanta to build a better community for everyone in the atlanta region through education about the key issues facing the region and inspiring members and others to take on and exercise real leadership…
The organization offers social services as a compassionate outreach to abused, neglected and dependent children and families in need. the organization strives to positively impact the lives of children, families and all those who receive…
Atlanta Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc.'s mission: To educate the community and to recruit, train and supervise court appointed volunteers to advocate for the best interest, safety and permanent placement of abused and neglected…
Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
Girls on the Run Georgia empowers girls with vital social-emotional skills to help them succeed in school, at home, and within friendships. Our programs, Girls on the Run (3rd-5th grade) and Heart & Sole (6th-8th grade) are taught by…
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Children's Shelter Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Second Leash On Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN ↗
- Who funds WYLDE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Agape Community Center ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Historic Oakland Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
- Who funds MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds AUTOMOTIVE TRAINING CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Hillside Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SWIFT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STAR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Horizon Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LARCHE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds TECHBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds ANDREW P STEWART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Community Toolbank ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INITIATIVE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds FCS URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CLARKSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPE THRU SOAP INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · AEC Trust · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Tuw Thomas H Pitts
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abreu M & F Ctr Tr Ua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Abreu M & F Ctr Tr Ua?
Find your warmest path to Abreu M & F Ctr Tr Ua through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.