Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tpg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$152kHuman Services$115kYouth Development$102kInternational$45kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kEmployment$30kPhilanthropy$17kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$10,840
Median grant
5
States reached
$129k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINSHIP HOUSE$57,703
CASA CLACKAMAS COUNTY$57,703
GIRLS INC PNW$25,025
ATHLETES FOR KIDS YOUTH MENTORING$25,025
SAM DAY FOUNDATION$25,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$10,840
DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OREGON$10,000
MANA FOOD BANK$2,622
RED CROSS$2,622
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$1,000
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$1,000
CAL POLY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%CAL POLY: $1k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17k → 9%MEDICAL TEAM INTERNATIONAL: $45k → 8%CASA CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $58k → 8%SAM DAY FOUNDATION: $77k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $1k → 15%RED CROSS: $3k → 9%MANA FOOD BANK: $3k → 12%ATHLETES FOR KIDS YOUTH MENTORING: $25k → 9%CAL POLY SAN LUIS OBISPO: $1k → 12%A VILLAGE FOR ONE: $52k → 8%EVERY CHILD PDX: $30k → 12%DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OREGON: $10k → 8%SAM DAY FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%EVERY CHILD PDX: $10k → 8%SAM DAY FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OREGON: $5k → 8%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%KINSHIP HOUSE: $58k → 12%GIRLS INC PNW: $25k → 12%US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Tpg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Tpg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

2
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
3
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
4
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
7
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

8
Center for the Pacific-Asian Family Inc

Cpaf's mission is to build healthy and safe communities by addressing the root causes and consequences of family violence and violence against women. cpaf is committed to meeting the specific cultural and language needs of asian pacific…

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
10
Child and Family Service

The organization's primary purpose is strengthening families in hawaii.

Unclassified
11
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
12
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medical Teams International and the most unlike its peers is Incight Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAM DAY FOUNDATION — $126,628 · Food & NutritionSAM DAY FOUNDATION+1 more — $2,622 · Food & NutritionIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientATHLETES FOR KIDS YOUTH MENTORING — $25,025 · OtherATHLETES FOR KIDS YOUTH MENTORIN…GIRLS INC PNW — $25,025 · OtherGIRLS INC PNWCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $10,840 · OtherCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATIONAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & It…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $17,340 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+5 more — $6,622 · OtherKINSHIP HOUSE — $57,703 · HealthKINSHIP HOUSEDOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OREGON — $15,000 · HealthDOWN SYNDROME N…CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $57,703 · Crime & LegalCASA OF CLAC…A VILLAGE FOR ONE — $51,628 · Youth DevelopmentA VILLAGE …MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $45,016 · InternationalMEDICAL T…INCIGHT COMPANY — $30,000 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · Education
Food & Nutrition$129,250Other$154,852Health$72,703Crime & Legal$57,703Youth Development$51,628International$45,016Education$32,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAM DAY FOUNDATION — $126,628 over 3y, 10% of budgetA VILLAGE FOR ONE — $51,628 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $45,016 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINCIGHT COMPANY — $30,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $17,340 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OREGON — $15,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $2,622 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation TrustOR17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tpg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • A Village for One33% of income from government
  • Warner Pacific University14% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
  • Casa of Clackamas County0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tpg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tpg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph