Skip to content

· Private foundation

Townsend Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$141k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$998kArts & Culture$573kPublic Benefit$245kCrime & Legal$217kRecreation & Sports$28kHealth$4kHousing & Shelter$2kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $200
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $141k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$140,599
CATO INSTITUTE$48,400
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$25,000
THE JOFFREY BALLET$25,000
THE SEAQUIST HOUSE FOUNDATION$25,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOS Chidren's Villages Illinois: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
RI
CO
VA
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 22 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+22%

Still filing today

73%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2025 · $972k · revenue +56%
  • TJ
    THE JOFFREY BALLET
    9× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +90%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • BM
    Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -67%
  • PP
    PETERS PRAIRIE SCHOOL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • OF
    ONE FAMILY ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
8
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
12
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspen Art Museum; the most unlike its peers is Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Chicago: $971,799 · EducationUniversity of Chicago+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $269,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JOFFREY BALLETJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $219,600 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASSSEAQUIST HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureSEAQUIST HOUSE FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $9,572 · Arts & CultureCATO INSTITUTE: $245,200 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUT…INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $215,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE F…University of Chicago - Court Theatre Fund: $28,200 · OtherThe University of Chicago - Forefront Fund: $20,000 · OtherNYYC FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherLes Dames D'Aspen LTD: $4,200 · OtherUniversity of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital Service: $2,767 · OtherUS SAILING FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Other+6 more: $8,500 · OtherBella Mente Quantum Racing Association: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $7,666 · Recreation & SportsJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsKINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesONE FAMILY ILLINOIS: $1,667 · Human ServicesBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $760 · Health
Education$972,799Arts & Culture$533,672Public Benefit$245,200Civil Rights$215,000Other$72,167Recreation & Sports$25,166Human Services$3,667Health$760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $971,799 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $269,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $245,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $219,600 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $215,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSEAQUIST HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetBella Mente Quantum Racing Association: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $7,666 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $6,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLes Dames D'Aspen LTD: $4,200 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetONE FAMILY ILLINOIS: $1,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS: $1,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,172 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $760 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE JOFFREY BALLET ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds SEAQUIST HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bella Mente Quantum Racing Association ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JUDD GOLDMAN ADAPTIVE SAILING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Les Dames D'Aspen LTD ↗
  • Who funds KINGSPORT HOMELESS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE FAMILY ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES AGAINST MANDATORY MINIMUMS ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MARITIME MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Townsend Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Townsend Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Townsend Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph