Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tomkins Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$223k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$275kInternational$244kPhilanthropy$170kHuman Services$78kCivil Rights$78kEnvironment$64kPublic Benefit$59kArts & Culture$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 98% of reported assets are held in Benjamin Edwards.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$50,000
WAY TO RISE$23,000
THE HAMLIN SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
FRIENDS OF CHRIST HOSPITAL$15,000
WORLD PULSE VOICES$15,000
WOMENS DONOR NETWORK$13,090
UNITED NATIONS RELIEF & WORKS AGENCY$11,148
WAY TO WIN$10,000
CAROLINE FEDERATION FUND$5,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRAN$5,000
AZ CENTER FOR ENPOWERMENT$5,000
TOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS$5,000
PA STANDS UP INSTITUTE$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPBERKELEY INC: $500 → 9%WORLD PULSE: $25k → 12%FRIENDS OF JANE ADENY MEMORIAL SCHOOL: $2k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $15k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRAN: $5k → 10%WORLD PULSE: $10k → 12%FRIENDS OF JANE ADENY MEMORIAL SCHOOL: $500 → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%WORLD PULSE: $10k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%WORLD PULSE: $10k → 12%WORLD PULSE: $5k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$943k · 35 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
57

Total granted

$943k
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+39%

Still filing today

77%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WD
    WOMEN DONORS NETWORK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $148k · revenue +276%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    2× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +127%
  • K
    Kurandza
    6× · 2017–2023 · $43k · revenue +519%

Funded once

  • PF
    POWERPAC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -68%
  • DI
    Dairies in Developing Communities Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
5
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
6
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
7
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
12
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Children; the most unlike its peers is Women Thrive Worldwide (Ch 7 Bkrptcy). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
37/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $108,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HAMLIN SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherTHE HAMLIN SCHOOLSIERRA CLUB: $27,000 · OtherSIERRA CLUBACT BLUE: $20,105 · OtherDairies in Developing Communities Inc: $20,000 · Other+66 more: $250,302 · Other+66 moreWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $147,937 · PhilanthropyWOMEN DONORS NETW…FRIENDS OF CHRIST'S HOSPITAL: $15,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF CHRIST…TIDES FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $7,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $4,500 · PhilanthropyWOMEN THRIVE WORLDWIDE (CH 7 BKRPTCY): $96,315 · InternationalWOMEN THRIVE WOR…Kurandza: $43,202 · InternationalKurandzaInternational Rescue Committee INC: $19,835 · InternationalInternational Re…+7 more: $18,876 · International+7 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of Il…University of Arizona Foundation: $35,000 · EducationUniversity of Ar…WAY TO RISE: $28,000 · EducationWAY TO RISETOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $10,000 · EducationTOWN SCHOOL FOR …+1 more: $1,000 · EducationWorld Pulse Voices: $75,000 · Human ServicesWorld Puls…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $22,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COM…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAM…CAROLINA FEDERATION FUND: $6,000 · Human Services+2 more: $2,700 · Human ServicesPOWERPAC FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Civil RightsFREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING: $19,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $250 · Civil RightsInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $15,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentRainforest Action Network: $3,400 · EnvironmentURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Environment+1 more: $500 · Environment
Other$475,407Philanthropy$182,437International$178,228Education$174,000Human Services$116,200Civil Rights$59,250Environment$25,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMEN DONORS NETWORK: $147,937 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN THRIVE WORLDWIDE (CH 7 BKRPTCY): $96,315 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetWorld Pulse Voices: $75,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetTHE HAMLIN SCHOOL: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKurandza: $43,202 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAY TO RISE: $28,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $19,835 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING: $19,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInfact DBA Corporate Accountability: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHRIST'S HOSPITAL: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $8,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA FEDERATION FUND: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $4,466 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONKOZE USA INC: $3,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $3,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForward Together: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMADRE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVER GREENING: $1,039 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF RECONCILIATION INC: $1,010 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE ARE DOWN HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN ECOLOGY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Womens Studies Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMEN DONORS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN THRIVE WORLDWIDE (CH 7 BKRPTCY) ↗
  • Who funds World Pulse Voices ↗
  • Who funds THE HAMLIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Kurandza ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WAY TO RISE ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds POWERPAC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dairies in Developing Communities Inc ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING ↗
  • Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHRIST'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA FEDERATION FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA25.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Arkay Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tomkins Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tomkins Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Asian Community Development Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Infact Dba Corporate Accountability: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tomkins Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tomkins Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tomkins Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph