· Public charity
Student Freedom Initiative Inc
Student freedom initiative is dedicated to ensuring freedom in professional and life choices for students attending minority serving institutions (msis).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $394,523 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $965,023 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $570,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY | $50,100 |
| MOREHOUSE COLLEGE | $38,578 |
| LINCOLN UNIVERSITY | $31,000 |
| UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| VIRGINIA UNION UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| SELMA UNIVERSITY | $19,996 |
| BLUEFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| ILISAGVIK COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| RED LAKE NATION COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| VOORHEES UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMOREHOUSE COLLEGE3× · 2023–2025 · $117k · revenue +27%
- VUVIRGINIA UNION UNIVERSITY2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +29%
- SUSELMA UNIVERSITY2× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +161%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $917k
- DUDILLARD UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $95k · revenue -27%
- XUXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANAone grant, 2024 · $81k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The College provides a Christian based environment suitable for learning, it provides liberal arts and religious programs for students from all ethnic backgrounds designed to develop their potential for leadership and service to a global…
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…
Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…
The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…
Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…
Lincoln college uniquely empowers students to realize their full potential
Allen University is an academic community which provides students an opportunity to obtain baccalaureate and graduate degrees in liberal arts and professional programs in traditional and distance education formats. The University has a…
The mission of cumberland university is to provide a personalized, high-quality, value-based educational experience that equips learners to lead, serve, and excel in an ever-evolving world.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Thomas university is an independent, not for profit, institution of higher education with undergraduate and graduate programs that prepare students for successful careers and responsible citizenship in a rapidly changing and complex world.
Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bennett College and the most unlike its peers is Central State University National Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLAFLIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA UNION UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DILLARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
- Who funds SELMA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HAMPTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Voorhees College ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Tougaloo College ↗
- Who funds LAWSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Stillman College ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Miles College Inc ↗
- Who funds Paine College ↗
- Who funds HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FISK UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOWIE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BENNETT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY WILBERFORCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RED LAKE NATION COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LAC COURTE OREILLES OJIBWE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Ilisagvik College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Strada Education Foundation Inc · Tom Joyner Foundation Inc · Thurgood Marshall College Fund · National Collegiate Athletic Association · United Negro College Fund Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Educational Credit Management Corporation · Folds of Honor Foundation · World Learning Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Partnership for Education Advancement Inc · Executive Leadership Council
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Student Freedom Initiative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.