How much did TOM & PATTY DOAR FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of TOM & PATTY DOAR FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

valleyjusticeresearch

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k21 grants · $80k
$10k–50k9 grants · $240k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$50,000
GRACE PLACE$40,000
TURNINGPOINT FOR VICTIMS OF$35,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER$35,000
THE RETREAT$35,000
FIVE LOAVES INC$22,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
FREE CLINIC OF PIERCE AND ST CROIX$20,000
NEW RICHMOND AREA CENTER LTD$18,000
FAMILY MEANS$15,000
MIDWAY CONTEMPORARY ART$7,500
TRANSCENDING THROUGH EDUCATION$6,500
NEW RICHMOND HIGH SCHOOL$6,500
NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDAT$5,000
THE DEERFIELD$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.6M · 31 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.6M

$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%

+90%

Still filing today

42%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationCivil RightsHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY
5× · 2020–2024 · $165k · revenue +71%
FR
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER - ST CROIX VALLEY
5× · 2020–2024 · $96k · revenue +186%
FC
FREE CLINIC OF PIERCE AND ST CROIX
4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +71%

Funded once

SA
SALVATION ARMY DBA GRACE PLACE
one grant, 2020 · $35k
TC
THE COMMUNITY OF RECOVERING PEOPLE INC (DBA THE RETREAT)
one grant, 2020 · $30k
FC
FREE CLINIC OF PIERCE AND ST CROIX COUNTIES
one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cornerhouse

To partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.

Crime & Legal

Family Pathways

Work alongside people and the community to enhance lives and champion positive social change.

Human Services

FamilyWise Services

Strengthening families by promoting the safety, stability and wellbeing of children.

Health

Turningpoint for Victims of Domestic and

Provide support and resources to achieve freedom from domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services

Fair Count Inc

Fair count builds long-term power within historically undercounted communities. with the census as our north star, we use every iteration of civic participation as a catalyst to build a more equitable democracy.

Community Improvement

Partners for Affordable Housing

Provides shelter for homeless families & individuals, & helps them to secure long-term housing.

—

Massachusetts Fair Housing Center Inc

Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.

Housing & Shelter

Minnesota Internship Center

To partner with communities and learners to achieve academic, career, and life success.

Education

Violence Free Minnesota

To represent victim/survivors of relationship abuse and member programs; challenge systems and institutions; promote social change; and support, educate, and connect member programs.

—

Central Minnesota Mental Health Center

Fostering healthy lives and thriving communities.

Health

Diversity Council

Education to embrace diversity for building a healthy, inclusive, and prosperous community.

—

Fair Housing Opportunities of Northwest

The fair housing center is a civil rights agency that promotes housing choice, the protection and expansion of fair housing rights and the resolution of landlord tenant disputes through mediation.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Project Deep Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

20/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,372,500Housing & Shelter$165,000Crime & Legal$96,000Health$87,000Human Services$37,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Arts & Culture$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TOM & PATTY DOAR FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FREE CLINIC OF PIERCE AND ST CROIX.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~23 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +71% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 205892220 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FREE CLINIC OF PIERCE AND ST CROIX, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 23 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Tom & Patty Doar Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tom & Patty Doar Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TOM & PATTY DOAR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Tom & Patty Doar Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

TOM & PATTY DOAR FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Tom & Patty Doar Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph