Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom and Judy Love Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$252k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$7.7MHealth$6.5MEducation$4.2MPublic Benefit$1.5MPhilanthropy$605kHousing & Shelter$513kArts & Culture$152kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$200,000
BISHOP JOHN CARROLL CATHOLIC SCHOOL$20,000
OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION$5,000
OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY$5,000
COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC$2,000
SANTA FE FAMILY LIFE CENTER$1,000
OKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
JESUITS USA CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE$1,000
CHRIST THE KING CHURCH$1,000
OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER$1,000
OKC BEAUTIFUL$1,000
ST JOHN THE BAPTIST CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
YWCA OKLAHOMA CITY$1,000
BISHOP MCGUINNESS CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $100 → 9%GENERAL TOMMY FRANKS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE & MUSEUM: $1k → 23%ITN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $1k → 16%ITN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 21 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
37

Total granted

$19M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+20%

Still filing today

48%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
    4× · 2018–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +43%
  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    4× · 2018–2024 · $600k · revenue +13%
  • OH
    OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME
    2× · 2020–2021 · $26k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF NICHOLS HILLS
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +39%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
4
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
5
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
6
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
7
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
8
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
9
Oklahoma City Art Museum Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

Support the oklahoma city community foundation through distributions made to the oklahoma city museum of art.

Arts & Culture
10
Oklahoma Bar Foundation

The oklahoma bar foundation provides annual funding through grants to promote the advancement of justice, to provide critical civil legal services to those in need, and to increase public awareness and understanding of the american legal…

Crime & Legal
11
Central Oklahoma United Methodist Retirement Facility Inc

To develop and provide premier, wellness-based campuses and community outreach.

Human Services
12
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Focus On Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY: $7,500,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITYMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $6,000,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATIONCITY OF NICHOLS HILLS: $1,500,000 · OtherCITY OF NICHOLS HILLSUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO+44 more: $1,993,750 · Other+44 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $2,515,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…+2 more: $30,755 · EducationUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $600,250 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $508,100 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $100,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $26,000 · Arts & CultureLYRIC THEATRE OF OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCanterbury Voices Inc: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $5,800 · Arts & CultureNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsCOLUMBUS CORPORATION OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $5,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthCaringBridge: $250 · Health
Other$17,993,750Education$2,545,755Philanthropy$605,250Youth Development$508,100Arts & Culture$141,800Recreation & Sports$7,000Health$6,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $2,515,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $600,250 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $508,100 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY: $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $26,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $25,755 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN MOTHERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYRIC THEATRE OF OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanterbury Voices Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetITNCENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY BEAUTIFUL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGAMMA PHI BETA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACEFUL ANIMAL ADOPTION SHLTR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGENERAL TOMMY FRANKS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE AND MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDentists Donating Smiles to Oklahomans INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA REPERTORY THEATRE GROUP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS ON HOME INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH'S PERUVIAN MISSION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY MUSEUM OF ART INC FKA OKLAHOMA CITY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLS HILLS PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MOTHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LYRIC THEATRE OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Canterbury Voices Inc ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ITNCENTRAL OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Fidelity FoundationOK42.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Gabcare Foundation · The Ann Lacy Foundation · Bowen Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom and Judy Love Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom and Judy Love Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Canterbury Voices Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tom and Judy Love Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tom and Judy Love Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom and Judy Love’s filings →

More from the funding graph