Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom and Jill Lincoln Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$743k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$2.2MPublic Benefit$205kCrime & Legal$80kRecreation & Sports$58kReligion$32kHuman Services$31kCommunity Improvement$25kEnvironment$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $421k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$32,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AKRON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$250,000
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC$200,000
CITY OF MEDINA$141,000
MEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$80,000
MIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHEAST OHIO$32,500
MAIN STREET MEDINA INC$22,000
MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC$10,000
SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH$5,500
FELLOWSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $700k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $700k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $300k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $200k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 5 repeat orgs$398k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$2.2M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+7%

Still filing today

60%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $347k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +21%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY
    2× · 2022–2024 · $28k · revenue +15%
  • MS
    MAIN STREET MEDINA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • WC
    WEST CREEK CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +7%
  • RF
    REPLAY FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Medina County

Hospice of medina county provides palliative end-of-life care, caregiver support, and bereavement services throughout northern ohio. in celebration of the individual worth of each life, we strive to relieve suffering, enhance comfort,…

—
2
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health
3
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
4
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
5
Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc

Our mission: to lead our communities to well-being, one person at a time. this mission is carried out by serving the people of a multi-county service area in reference to their current and future needs for health care services. our major…

Health
6
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
9
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

—
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
12
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Society for Handicapped Citizens of Medina County Inc; the most unlike its peers is West Creek Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $1,900,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INCCITY OF MEDINA: $204,718 · OtherCITY OF MEDINAMEDINA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE: $80,000 · OtherMEDINA COUNTY SH…MIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $57,500 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUE O…ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOP…+3 more: $9,500 · OtherAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250,000 · HealthAKRON CHILD…REPLAY FOR KIDS: $10,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY: $28,309 · Crime & LegalMAIN STREET MEDINA INC: $24,500 · Community ImprovementWEST CREEK CONSERVANCY: $13,450 · EnvironmentMEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,900,000Other$376,718Health$260,000Crime & Legal$28,309Community Improvement$24,500Environment$13,450Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $1,900,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY: $28,309 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetMAIN STREET MEDINA INC: $24,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWEST CREEK CONSERVANCY: $13,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREPLAY FOR KIDS: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSOCIETY FOR HANDICAPPED CITIZENS OF MEDINA COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W Stephenson FndOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W Stephenson Fnd · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Feckley Charitable Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom and Jill Lincoln Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom and Jill Lincoln Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom and Jill Lincoln Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom and Jill Lincoln Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom and Jill Lincoln’s filings →

    More from the funding graph