Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom & Glory Sullivan Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$701k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.4MInternational$738kEducation$440kHuman Services$62kCivil Rights$56kPhilanthropy$50kHealth$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 26 grants below total $377,025, the rows itemized in this filing. The $700,833 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $323,808 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $354k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Burmese Americans for Peace & Justice (BACJP)$20,000
Togo Mission$20,000
Compassionate Franciscan Sisters (CFSOP)$20,000
Compassionate Franciscan Sisters (CFSOP)$20,000
Congregation of the Holy Ghost$20,000
Coptic Mission$20,000
Burmese Americans for Peace & Justice (BACJP)$20,000
Notre Dame Catholic School Denver$20,000
Our Lady of the Visitation$20,000
Society of Our Lady / SOLT$20,000
St Ambrose Catholic Church$20,000
Sacred Heart of Jesus$20,000
FOCUS$20,000
Cathedral of the Sacred Heart$20,000
Global Humanitarian Mission$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OBRIA GROUP INC: $10k → 10%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
IL
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 61 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

61 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
82

Total granted

$3.4M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+31%

Still filing today

13%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $221k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $404k · revenue +135%
  • TM
    TOGO MISSION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $194k · revenue +26%
  • VF
    VISION FOR THE POOR
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMPASSIONATE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE POOR INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • BA
    BURMESE AMERICAN CATHOLICS FOR PEAC
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • X
    X
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paulist Press Inc

The Paulist Press was founded to provide Catholic literature and resources for the the religious use of parishes, institutions, individuals and other religious bodies to further the educational and mission goals of the Christian faith and…

—
2
Ave Maria University Inc

University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church

Education
3
Ave Maria Communications

Ave Maria Communications (AMC)employs radio, internet and other media to offer news, analysis, teaching, devotion and music to demonstrate Catholic values.

Religion
4
Theresians International Inc

Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It establishes small communities worldwide for women to further their spiritual and educational development.

—
5
Vitae Clinic Inc

To provide natural integrated ob-gyn healthcare and fertility care for all women while honoring life.

Health
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
8
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
9
Walking With Purpose Inc

The primary purpose and mission of Walking with Purpose is religious in nature, specifically enabling women to know Christ through scripture. Walking with Purpose Inc. aims to bring women into a deeper personal relationship with Christ by…

—
10
Missionary Daughters of the Eternal Father

As Charismatic women of the Catholic church, seek to let our light shine through providing help to the less fortunate among us.

Religion
11
Focolare Media Inc

Our mission is to provide content that empowers people to grow spiritually, improve relationships, engage in dialogue and foster collaboration within the Church and throughout society.

—
12
Vocation Ministry

Vocation Ministry's mission is to equip the Church once again to awaken the call of a vocation within the human heart by creating an environment that encourages men and women to say "Yes" to God's call in their lives to the priesthood,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sisters of Mary Boystowns and Girlstowns Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marys Choice Rva. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $369,339 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $158,000 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF THE POOR USA INC: $147,856 · Other+130 more: $3,054,306 · Other+130 moreSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $404,439 · InternationalSISTER OF MARY BO…TOGO MISSION INC: $193,500 · InternationalTOGO MISSION INCCOMPASSIONATE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $50,000 · InternationalCOMPASSIONATE FRA…VISION FOR THE POOR: $40,000 · InternationalVISION FOR THE PO…HOME OF HOPE INDIA - US: $24,400 · InternationalTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $40,000 · ReligionST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY: $20,000 · ReligionYoung Catholic Professionals: $20,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $10,000 · ReligionCatholics Come Home Inc: $10,000 · ReligionSt Edwards University: $20,000 · EducationThe Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc: $20,000 · EducationMercy Center Foundation USA Inc: $10,051 · EducationAVE MARIA SCHOOL OF LAW: $10,000 · EducationAugustine Institute Inc: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $1,450 · EducationGlobal Humanitarian Mission Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMARYS CHOICE RVA: $10,000 · Human ServicesLife-Giving Wounds Corporation: $20,000 · HealthHOPE 4 LIFE: $16,162 · HealthDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,729,501International$712,339Religion$100,000Education$71,501Human Services$40,000Health$36,162Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $404,439 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTOGO MISSION INC: $193,500 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetVISION FOR THE POOR: $40,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Given Institute Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INDIA - US: $24,400 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSt Edwards University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLife-Giving Wounds Corporation: $20,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetGlobal Humanitarian Mission Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Catholic Professionals: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHERALDS OF GOOD NEWS OF ST PAUL INC: $19,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMARYS PLACE PITTSBURGH: $11,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMercy Center Foundation USA Inc: $10,051 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OBRIA GROUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPATH TO PEACE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAVE MARIA SCHOOL OF LAW: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholics Come Home Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYS CHOICE RVA: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetVAGABOND MISSIONS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVALON SCHOOL INC: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKEWOOD SCHOOL INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGO MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds VISION FOR THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund IncCT19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Our Sunday Visitor Inc · Koch Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Anima Christi Retreats Inc · The Shepherd Foundation Ltd · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom & Glory Sullivan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom & Glory Sullivan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom & Glory Sullivan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom & Glory Sullivan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $860k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom & Glory Sullivan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph