Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom & Donna Neshek Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$50kEducation$33kEnvironment$33kPhilanthropy$24kEmployment$20kArts & Culture$19kRecreation & Sports$12kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$517k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC$11,150
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$6,500
TOGETHER WOMEN RISE$5,000
GENEVA LAKES CONSERVANCY INC$5,000
KETTLE MORAINE LAND TRUST$5,000
VIP SERVICES INC$2,500
WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO$1,500
MILWAUKEE PBS$1,500
HOPE NOW$1,000
JOE DEMAY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AGAPE HOUSE INC: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 14 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$193k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+47%

Still filing today

50%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +177%
  • TW
    TOGETHER WOMEN RISE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $24k · revenue +32%
  • VS
    VIP SERVICES INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AGAPE HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +9%
  • EA
    Elkhorn Area School District
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • WC
    WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +137%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
2
Gathering Waters Inc

Gathering waters (wisconsin's alliance for land trusts) strengthens land trusts to protect wisconsin's special places and grow healthy, vibrant communities. the stronger the alliance between gathering waters' staff and board members, land…

Environment
3
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Inc

The wisconsin wildlife federation has a dual mission to engage in conservation education and to advocate for sound conservation policy.

Environment
4
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy

The mission of gtrlc is to protect significant natural, scenic and farm lands and advance land stewardship now and for future generations.

Environment
5
Wabash Valley Goodwill Inc

Goodwill industries is a nonprofit provider of employment and other critical community based services for people who have a disability, people who lack education or job experience, households facing economic challenges, and others in need.

Employment
6
Western Lake Superior Habitat for Humanity

Provide home ownership opportunities to low-income households and make repairs to existing homes for very low-income homeowners.

—
7
Waupun Area Food Pantry Inc

Provide free food to needy families

Food & Nutrition
8
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
9
Lake Area Free Clinic Inc

The lake area free clinic is the medical and dental home to low-income residents of waukesha county. the mission is to provide high-quality comprehensive health care to those in need.

Health
10
Habitat for Humanity of Wisconsin River Area Inc

Build/remodel homes sold at favorable terms to qualified low-income individuals. also, to operate two retail restore outlets to sell donated building materials.

—
11
Lake Forest Open Lands Association

Since its establishment in 1967, the association has acquired, preserved and maintained over 930 acres of local native landscapes including prairies, savannas, ravines, woodlands and wetlands for the benefit and enjoyment of the entire…

Environment
12
The River Alliance of Wisconsin Inc

To empower people to protect and restore water.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Geneva Fresh Air Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Together Women Rise. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $30,500 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONVIP SERVICES INC: $20,350 · OtherVIP SERVICES INCMILWAUKEE PBS: $8,750 · OtherMILWAUKEE PBSHOPE NOW INC: $5,000 · OtherHOPE NOW INC+13 more: $14,850 · Other+13 moreOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC: $48,250 · HealthOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INCGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $19,750 · EnvironmentGENEVA LAKE CONS…KETTLE MORAINE LAND TRUST INC: $11,000 · EnvironmentKETTLE MORAINE L…TOGETHER WOMEN RISE: $23,500 · PhilanthropyTOGETHER WOM…LAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 · Recreation & SportsWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $1,100 · Arts & CultureAGAPE HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$79,450Health$48,250Environment$30,750Philanthropy$23,500Recreation & Sports$10,500Arts & Culture$10,100Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC: $48,250 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTOGETHER WOMEN RISE: $23,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVIP SERVICES INC: $20,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $19,750 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetKETTLE MORAINE LAND TRUST INC: $11,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetLAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Guardsmen: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER WOMEN RISE ↗
  • Who funds VIP SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds KETTLE MORAINE LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Guardsmen ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kikkoman Foods Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kikkoman Foods Foundation Inc · Kunes Family Foundation · United Way of Walworth County · Ulla & Bertil Brunk Foundation Inc · Sbk Stearns Family Foundation · Keefe Foundation Inc · Carol Bernick Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Pentair Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom & Donna Neshek Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom & Donna Neshek Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom & Donna Neshek Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom & Donna Neshek Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom & Donna Neshek Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph