Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ulla & Bertil Brunk Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$193kRecreation & Sports$90kHealth$70kHuman Services$56kEmployment$31kYouth Development$26kFood & Nutrition$12kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM$22,500
HOLIDAY HOME CAMP$12,500
OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC$10,000
TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER INC$8,000
THE WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC$5,000
NEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC$5,000
GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA$2,500
VIP SERVICES INC$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 31% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEVER SAY NEVER FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $15k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $23k → 14%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $15k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 14%TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $10k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 14%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $10k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 14%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $10k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 14%TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 14%TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $10k → 10%SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM: $20k → 14%TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 10%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $10k → 10%TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $8k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $5k → 10%NEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC: $5k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $5k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $5k → 10%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $5k → 10%TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 10%OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC: $5k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $5k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $5k → 10%THE WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $5k → 10%THE WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $4k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $3k → 10%THE WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $3k → 10%VIP SERVICES INC: $3k → 10%GEORGE WILLIAMS COLLEGE OF AURORA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $20k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $20k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $13k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $12k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $10k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $5k → 10%HOLIDAY HOME CAMP: $5k → 10%LAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMP: $5k → 10%LAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMP: $5k → 10%LAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMP: $5k → 10%COVENANT HARBOR: $5k → 10%LAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMP: $5k → 10%GENEVA LAKES FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 10%LAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMP: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$414k · 7 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$414k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+4%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsCrime & LegalArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2018–2024 · $143k · revenue +21%
  • LAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +35%
  • OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • GW
    GEORGE WILLIAMS COLLEGE OF AURORA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Area Free Clinic Inc

The lake area free clinic is the medical and dental home to low-income residents of waukesha county. the mission is to provide high-quality comprehensive health care to those in need.

Health
2
St Cloud Area Family Ymca

St. Cloud Area Family YMCA's mission is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that promote healthy lifestyles, strong families and positive youth development to build healthy spirit, mind and body for all, regardless…

3
The Scenic Rivers Young Men's Christian Association

The scenic rivers ymca is a non-profit charitable organization dedicated to bringing the community together and the development of the total individual in mind, body and spirit. we strive to strengthen kids, families, individuals and…

Human Services
4
North Central Florida Ymca Inc

Our mission is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. The Y works side-by-side with our neighbors to address critical community needs that help those we serve.

5
Young Men's Christian Association of Wabash Valley Inc

The ymca of wabash valley is a charitable nonprofit human service organization that includes children, teens, women and men, and does not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, sex, or national origin. the mission of the ymca is "to…

6
Young Mens Christian Association of Lafayette

The lafayette family ymca is a volunteer led public charity that includes men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races,and religions. our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build…

7
Diaper Train

Our mission is to provide diapers, equipping families with a necessary tool to increase their mental and physical health and wellbeing. a diaper can change a life. diaper train is committed to a future where every family in wake county has…

Human Services
8
Lincoln Area Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. activities include child care; youth development through a variety of youth sports, leadership programs and special needs…

9
The Tree House Inc

The organization provides services related to child abuse treatment and prevention. the organization provides treatment for affected individuals and prevention and training for victims and their families through child services, victim's…

Crime & Legal
10
Winona Family Ymca Inc

The winona family ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families and strong…

11
Wapakoneta Family Ymca

The mission of the wapakoneta family ymca is: to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all. the wapakoneta family ymca is a charitable, community social-service organization…

Human Services
12
Duluth Area Family Ymca

The duluth area family ymca is dedicated to putting the principles of caring, honesty, respect, and responsibility into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Geneva Lakes Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vip Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO — $142,500 · Arts & CultureSWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATI…GEORGE WILLIAMS COLLEGE OF AURORA UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherGEORGE WILLIAMS COLLEGE O…VIP SERVICES INC — $30,977 · OtherVIP SERVICES INCLAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMP — $21,000 · OtherLAKE GENEVA YOUTH CAMPIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+1 more — $2,500 · OtherLAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC — $84,500 · Recreation & SportsLAKE GENEVA FRESH AI…Northwestern University — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern Univers…OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC — $70,000 · HealthOPEN ARMS FREE C…TREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER INC — $53,000 · Crime & LegalTREE HOUSE CH…NEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC — $5,000 · Crime & LegalNEW BEGINNING…WALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $12,000 · Food & NutritionNEVER SAY NEVER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$142,500Other$109,477Recreation & Sports$89,500Health$70,000Crime & Legal$58,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSWEDISH AMERICAN MUSEUM ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO — $142,500 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetLAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC — $84,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetOPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTREE HOUSE CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER INC — $53,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetVIP SERVICES INC — $30,977 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS APFV INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthwestern University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVER SAY NEVER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGENEVA LAKES FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kunes Family FoundationWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kunes Family Foundation · United Way of Walworth County · Kikkoman Foods Foundation Inc · Keefe Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Tom & Donna Neshek Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ulla & Bertil Brunk Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ulla & Bertil Brunk Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ulla & Bertil Brunk Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph